Thread overview
[phobos] phobos commit, revision 2336
Jan 16, 2011
dsource.org
Jan 16, 2011
Brad Roberts
Jan 16, 2011
Brad Roberts
Jan 16, 2011
Jonathan M Davis
January 15, 2011
phobos commit, revision 2336


user: andrei

msg:
Put binaries in different dirs depending on MODEL

http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2336

paths changed:
U   trunk/phobos/posix.mak

January 15, 2011
On 1/15/2011 7:08 PM, dsource.org wrote:
> phobos commit, revision 2336
> 
> 
> user: andrei
> 
> msg:
> Put binaries in different dirs depending on MODEL
> 
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2336
> 
> paths changed:
> U   trunk/phobos/posix.mak

Did those 64 bit tests really start failing again or did you regress that part of the make file?



January 15, 2011
I hoped I did nothing related. I updated, got conflict, chose "mine conflicts", oddly nothing conflicted, rand a build for checking, and committed. What did I do wrong?

Anyway... sent out a patch.

Andrei

On 1/15/11 9:21 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
> On 1/15/2011 7:08 PM, dsource.org wrote:
>> phobos commit, revision 2336
>>
>>
>> user: andrei
>>
>> msg:
>> Put binaries in different dirs depending on MODEL
>>
>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2336
>>
>> paths changed:
>> U   trunk/phobos/posix.mak
>
> Did those 64 bit tests really start failing again or did you regress that part of the make file?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
January 15, 2011
Hard to say, other than failing to review "svn diff" before submitting after resolving the conflicts.  I'd suggest that 'mine-conflicts' is risky, but I don't have that much experience with svn conflict resolution.  I _always_ select the (e)dit option and examine the changes closely.

On 1/15/2011 7:36 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I hoped I did nothing related. I updated, got conflict, chose "mine conflicts", oddly nothing conflicted, rand a build for checking, and committed. What did I do wrong?
> 
> Anyway... sent out a patch.
> 
> Andrei
> 
> On 1/15/11 9:21 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
>> On 1/15/2011 7:08 PM, dsource.org wrote:
>>> phobos commit, revision 2336
>>>
>>>
>>> user: andrei
>>>
>>> msg:
>>> Put binaries in different dirs depending on MODEL
>>>
>>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2336
>>>
>>> paths changed:
>>> U   trunk/phobos/posix.mak
>>
>> Did those 64 bit tests really start failing again or did you regress that part of the make file?
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

January 15, 2011
On Saturday 15 January 2011 19:08:00 dsource.org wrote:
> phobos commit, revision 2336
> 
> 
> user: andrei
> 
> msg:
> Put binaries in different dirs depending on MODEL
> 
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2336
> 
> paths changed:
> U   trunk/phobos/posix.mak

You seem to be setting BUILD _after_ you first use it. Is that intentional?

- Jonathan M Davis
January 16, 2011
Yah, that variable and a few others always come set from the outside (which overrides the setting inside the makefile; the latter is just for documentation purposes).

Andrei

On 1/15/11 11:20 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Saturday 15 January 2011 19:08:00 dsource.org wrote:
>> phobos commit, revision 2336
>>
>>
>> user: andrei
>>
>> msg:
>> Put binaries in different dirs depending on MODEL
>>
>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2336
>>
>> paths changed:
>> U   trunk/phobos/posix.mak
>
> You seem to be setting BUILD _after_ you first use it. Is that intentional?
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos