May 17, 2011 [phobos] Argh, how did I leave that main block in there by accident? (de572e9) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Are you so sure someone would *always* notice this?? This seems like an error that should be caught by automatic testing (unit test). I think with reviews, we are looking for subtle or logic errors, not obvious blow-up ones.? This was just a simple mistake, and that shit happens.? I don't think anyone said that people would check in bug-free code to the master branch. Note the time between the initial checkin and the fix, this was not a significant issue. -Steve >________________________________ >From: andralex <reply+c-386425-2aecf1b7f6afda42be20f0fedb55f7b83b33cb7f at reply.github.com> >To: schveiguy at yahoo.com >Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 12:49 AM >Subject: Re: [phobos] Argh, how did I leave that main block in there by accident? (de572e9) > >The onus is always on the committer to have run the unit tests. > >-- >Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/de572e9b131d1e66f23886815d9911313995f144#commitcomment-386425 > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/phobos/attachments/20110517/959f248e/attachment.html> |
May 17, 2011 [phobos] Argh, how did I leave that main block in there by accident? (de572e9) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Steve Schveighoffer | On 05/17/2011 06:43 AM, Steve Schveighoffer wrote: > Are you so sure someone would *always* notice this? This seems like an error that should be caught by automatic testing (unit test). > > I think with reviews, we are looking for subtle or logic errors, not obvious blow-up ones. This was just a simple mistake, and that shit happens. I don't think anyone said that people would check in bug-free code to the master branch. > > Note the time between the initial checkin and the fix, this was not a significant issue. > I would almost bet money that there is a script out there that would maintain separate branch as "the latest version of that other branch that passes the test". With the auto-tester in place, it shouldn't be hard to do. > -Steve > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* andralex > <reply+c-386425-2aecf1b7f6afda42be20f0fedb55f7b83b33cb7f at reply.github.com> > *To:* schveiguy at yahoo.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 17, 2011 12:49 AM > *Subject:* Re: [phobos] Argh, how did I leave that main block in > there by accident? (de572e9) > > The onus is always on the committer to have run the unit tests. > > -- > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/de572e9b131d1e66f23886815d9911313995f144#commitcomment-386425 > > > > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > phobos at puremagic.com > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/phobos/attachments/20110517/6638dd6b/attachment.html> |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation