Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 02, 2011 [phobos] v2.053 tag | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
druntime and Phobos both have a v2.053 tag as well as the druntime-2.053 and phobos-2.053 respectively. The latter two follow the naming scheme that we've been using for tags. So, I believe that they are the correct tag names. That being the case, is there any reason to keep the v2.053 tags around? As far as I can tell, they're identical to the X-2.053 tags, and having two 2.053 versions tagged is going to be confusing. Would it be a problem if I just deleted the v2.053 tags? - Jonathan M Davis |
June 02, 2011 [phobos] v2.053 tag | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jonathan M Davis |
On 6/2/2011 12:20 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Would it be a problem if I just
> deleted the v2.053 tags?
No. Please do.
|
June 02, 2011 [phobos] v2.053 tag | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | On 2011-06-02 02:16, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 6/2/2011 12:20 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > Would it be a problem if I just
> > deleted the v2.053 tags?
>
> No. Please do.
Okay. Done.
- Jonathan M Davis
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation