Hello,


I propose we add Vladimir Panteleev (CyberShadow) to Phobos' committers. Please let me know of your vote by email within a week's time.

(Also I think I've been overly politically correct about this. All this voting should happen if we're removing, not adding, a committer.)


Thanks,

Andrei
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
phobos@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

Yes.

-Steve

On Apr 2, 2014, at 9:17 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei@erdani.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> 
> I propose we add Vladimir Panteleev (CyberShadow) to Phobos' committers. Please let me know of your vote by email within a week's time.
> 
> (Also I think I've been overly politically correct about this. All this voting should happen if we're removing, not adding, a committer.)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrei
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos@puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos


_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
phobos@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

On Apr 2, 2014, at 9:17 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei@erdani.com> wrote:

> 
> (Also I think I've been overly politically correct about this. All this voting should happen if we're removing, not adding, a committer.)


Regarding voting on inclusion, I don't think it's overly burdensome when adding a person to request comments. I don't think we need a vote, but just objections if any exist.

I seriously doubt we would ever have a situation where a person has impressed anyone on the team, especially Andrei, to the point of warranting inclusion in the group, and somehow would elicit objections from anyone already on the team. But there is something to be said about giving a forum for the process to allow the team authority on whom it chooses for its members.

Given the nature of git and the fact that we can revoke privileges just as easily as granting them, it doesn't make a whole lot of difference whether we do this either way. But the sense of "yes, we all approved this guy" is important, even if it's just a formality. It's also nice as a contributor to have confirmation that the team does all want you on it :)

Also, given the fact that Facebook is starting to use D more, allowing an approval process lessens that appearance of conflict-of-interest for those who would care about that.

-Steve
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
phobos@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

2014-04-03 10:17 GMT+09:00 Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei@erdani.com>:

> Hello,
>
>
> I propose we add Vladimir Panteleev (CyberShadow) to Phobos' committers. Please let me know of your vote by email within a week's time.
>
> (Also I think I've been overly politically correct about this. All this voting should happen if we're removing, not adding, a committer.)
>

vote++

 Kenji Hara

Yes.

It's nice to ask, even if you know what the answer's going to be.

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei@erdani.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I propose we add Vladimir Panteleev (CyberShadow) to Phobos' committers. Please let me know of your vote by email within a week's time.
>
> (Also I think I've been overly politically correct about this. All this voting should happen if we're removing, not adding, a committer.)
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrei
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos@puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
phobos@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

Noted, thanks. -- Andrei

On 4/3/14, 7:33 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>
> On Apr 2, 2014, at 9:17 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei@erdani.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> (Also I think I've been overly politically correct about this. All this voting should happen if we're removing, not adding, a committer.)
>
>
> Regarding voting on inclusion, I don't think it's overly burdensome when adding a person to request comments. I don't think we need a vote, but just objections if any exist.
>
> I seriously doubt we would ever have a situation where a person has impressed anyone on the team, especially Andrei, to the point of warranting inclusion in the group, and somehow would elicit objections from anyone already on the team. But there is something to be said about giving a forum for the process to allow the team authority on whom it chooses for its members.
>
> Given the nature of git and the fact that we can revoke privileges just as easily as granting them, it doesn't make a whole lot of difference whether we do this either way. But the sense of "yes, we all approved this guy" is important, even if it's just a formality. It's also nice as a contributor to have confirmation that the team does all want you on it :)
>
> Also, given the fact that Facebook is starting to use D more, allowing an approval process lessens that appearance of conflict-of-interest for those who would care about that.
>
> -Steve
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos@puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
phobos@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

Yes, absolutely!


On 03/04/14 03:17, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I propose we add Vladimir Panteleev (CyberShadow) to Phobos' committers.
> Please let me know of your vote by email within a week's time.
>
> (Also I think I've been overly politically correct about this. All this
> voting should happen if we're removing, not adding, a committer.)
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrei
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos@puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
phobos@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

Yes!

He is doing awesome work :)


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad <lars@kyllingen.net>wrote:

> Yes, absolutely!
>
>
>
> On 03/04/14 03:17, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I propose we add Vladimir Panteleev (CyberShadow) to Phobos' committers. Please let me know of your vote by email within a week's time.
>>
>> (Also I think I've been overly politically correct about this. All this voting should happen if we're removing, not adding, a committer.)
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Andrei
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos@puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos@puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>

On 3 Apr 2014, at 3:17, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote
> I propose we add Vladimir Panteleev (CyberShadow) to Phobos' committers. Please let me know of your vote by email within a week's time.

Yes!

David
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
phobos@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

03-Apr-2014 05:17, Andrei Alexandrescu пишет:
> Hello,
>
>
> I propose we add Vladimir Panteleev (CyberShadow) to Phobos' committers. Please let me know of your vote by email within a week's time.
>
> (Also I think I've been overly politically correct about this. All this voting should happen if we're removing, not adding, a committer.)
>
>
> Thanks,

Yes!

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky

_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
phobos@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos