November 19, 2001 cast syntax | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Is the cast keyword required for casts, or not? What follows is from the D Programming Language, expressions section. It isn't very clear what exactly the D syntax actually is, especially since the very last thing is an example of why D doesn't need instanceof, which does not use the cast keyword: Sean Cast Expressions In C and C++, cast expressions are of the form: (type) unaryexpression There is an ambiguity in the grammar, however. Consider: (foo) - p; Is this a cast of a dereference of negated p to type foo, or is it p being subtracted from foo? This cannot be resolved without looking up foo in the symbol table to see if it is a type or a variable. But D's design goal is to have the syntax be context free - it needs to be able to parse the syntax without reference to the symbol table. So, in order to distinguish a cast from a parenthesized subexpression, a different syntax is necessary. C++ does this by introducing: dynamic_cast(expression) which is ugly and clumsy to type. D introduces the cast keyword: cast(foo) -p; cast (-p) to type foo (foo) - p; subtract p from foo cast has the nice characteristic that it is easy to do a textual search for it, and takes some of the burden off of the relentlessly overloaded () operator. D differs from C/C++ in another aspect of casts. Any casting of a class reference to a derived class reference is done with a runtime check to make sure it really is a proper downcast. This means that it is equivalent to the behavior of the dynamic_cast operator in C++. class A { ... } class B : A { ... } void test(A a, B b) { B bx = a; error, need cast B bx = cast(B) a; bx is null if a is not a B A ax = b; no cast needed A ax = cast(A) b; no runtime check needed for upcast } D does not have a Java style instanceof operator, because the cast operator performs the same function: Java: if (a instanceof B) D: if ((B) a) |
November 19, 2001 Re: cast syntax | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sean L. Palmer | "Sean L. Palmer" <spalmer@iname.com> wrote in message news:9tage9$1f0k$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Is the cast keyword required for casts, or not? It originally was, then I took it out, now I'm considering putting it back in. |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation