phobos commit, revision 2001

phobos commit, revision 2001

user: walter

msg:
merge changelogs

http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2001

It seems that, in the merge, some lines in the changelog were lost:

  Unlisted Bug:  std.algorithm.findAdjacent() [...]
  4681: Appender access violation

Also, this one is now listed twice:

  Unlisted Bug:  std.path.join("", "foo") [...]

-Lars

On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 03:21 -0400, dsource.org wrote:
> phobos commit, revision 2001
> 
> 
> user: walter
> 
> msg:
> merge changelogs
> 
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2001
> 
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

Also, bug 190 is listed, but I don't think that's correct -- it was reverted.

On 14 September 2010 09:34, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad <lars at kyllingen.net> wrote:
> It seems that, in the merge, some lines in the changelog were lost:
>
> ?Unlisted Bug: ?std.algorithm.findAdjacent() [...]
> ?4681: Appender access violation
>
> Also, this one is now listed twice:
>
> ?Unlisted Bug: ?std.path.join("", "foo") [...]
>
> -Lars
>
>
> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 03:21 -0400, dsource.org wrote:
>> phobos commit, revision 2001
>>
>>
>> user: walter
>>
>> msg:
>> merge changelogs
>>
>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2001
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>

On 14 September 2010 09:38, Don Clugston <dclugston at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Also, bug 190 is listed, but I don't think that's correct -- it was reverted.
Bug 3979 too.

In case you missed it, Walter, Rainer contributed a fix for the regression that 190's changes introduced in 4753 (the bug I filed before discovering that it was 190 that caused the problem).

So, reapplying 190 + the delta in 4753 should resolve both of them.

Obviously they can wait for the next cycle, just figured I'd point it out since things were a bit hectic around the time those changes were made.

On 9/14/2010 12:38 AM, Don Clugston wrote:
> Also, bug 190 is listed, but I don't think that's correct -- it was reverted.
> 
> On 14 September 2010 09:34, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad <lars at kyllingen.net> wrote:
>> It seems that, in the merge, some lines in the changelog were lost:
>>
>>  Unlisted Bug:  std.algorithm.findAdjacent() [...]
>>  4681: Appender access violation
>>
>> Also, this one is now listed twice:
>>
>>  Unlisted Bug:  std.path.join("", "foo") [...]
>>
>> -Lars
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 03:21 -0400, dsource.org wrote:
>>> phobos commit, revision 2001
>>>
>>>
>>> user: walter
>>>
>>> msg:
>>> merge changelogs
>>>
>>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2001
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> phobos mailing list
>>> phobos at puremagic.com
>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

On 9/14/2010 12:21 AM, dsource.org wrote:
> phobos commit, revision 2001
> 
> 
> user: walter
> 
> msg:
> merge changelogs
> 
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2001

Food for thought for future releases.. separate sections of the change log for each of dmd, druntime, and phobos.  It'd make merges a lot less problematic.

On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 01:39 -0700, Brad Roberts wrote:
> On 9/14/2010 12:21 AM, dsource.org wrote:
> > phobos commit, revision 2001
> > 
> > 
> > user: walter
> > 
> > msg:
> > merge changelogs
> > 
> > http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/2001
> 
> Food for thought for future releases.. separate sections of the change log for each of dmd, druntime, and phobos.  It'd make merges a lot less problematic.

Even more food for thought:  Now that the language is stabilising, and new features in Phobos are no longer deeply tied in with new features in DMD, wouldn't it make sense to separate the DMD and Phobos release cycles?

-Lars

----- Original Message ----

> From: Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com>
> To: phobos at puremagic.com
> Sent: Tue, September 14, 2010 4:01:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [phobos] phobos commit, revision 2001
> 
> In case you missed it, Walter, Rainer contributed a fix for the regression
>that
> 190's changes introduced in 4753 (the bug I filed before discovering  that it
>was
> 190 that caused the problem).
> 
> So, reapplying 190 + the  delta in 4753 should resolve both of them.
> 
> Obviously they can wait for  the next cycle, just figured I'd point it out
>since
> things were a bit hectic  around the time those changes were made.

:(

One more release that I can't use to develop std.process.

Can we get this patch applied right away after the release?  I might just apply the patch and use an unofficial dmd anyways.  std.process has sat in my todo box way too long.

-Steve

Forums