Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
December 13, 2010 [phobos] I thought we were about to release a beta? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
This release has some fixes for some important compiler bugs, and a couple of changes which will aid Phobos development (most notably, nothrow becomes usable, and some severe issues relating to const are fixed). Unless we expect to have a fix for the killer bug 4854 "Regression(2.047, Mac 10.5 only) writefln Segmentation fault if no globals", I think we should release a beta immediately. In particular, I think std.datetime should wait for the next cycle. If there are any known blockers, please list them now! |
December 13, 2010 [phobos] I thought we were about to release a beta? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Don Clugston | On 13 dec 2010, at 08:36, Don Clugston wrote: > This release has some fixes for some important compiler bugs, and a > couple of changes which will aid Phobos development (most notably, > nothrow becomes usable, and some severe issues relating to const are > fixed). > Unless we expect to have a fix for the killer bug 4854 > "Regression(2.047, Mac 10.5 only) writefln Segmentation fault if no > globals", I think we should release a beta immediately. I was hoping that someone could have a look at the patch I've attached to that ticket. That patch fixes the reported error (about the __tls_get_addr function) but it still segfaults, now in another place. I don't know if I introduced the n new segfault, if it's another bug or the solution we though would fix the problem wasn't enough. > In particular, I think std.datetime should wait for the next cycle. > > If there are any known blockers, please list them now! > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > phobos at puremagic.com > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos -- /Jacob Carlborg |
December 14, 2010 [phobos] I thought we were about to release a beta? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Don Clugston | Because the bug that should be repaired was discovered, I report it. dmd(trunk r804) crashes by the compilation of Phobos with following flags: DFLAGS=-unittest -d -g -debug See also(Japanese): http://twitter.com/#!/Rayerd/status/13261697154293760 http://hibari.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/tech/1281826764/885 There may be the last bug report and connection, but I do not understand it in detail. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5343 -- SHOO (2010/12/13 16:36), Don Clugston wrote: > This release has some fixes for some important compiler bugs, and a > couple of changes which will aid Phobos development (most notably, > nothrow becomes usable, and some severe issues relating to const are > fixed). > Unless we expect to have a fix for the killer bug 4854 > "Regression(2.047, Mac 10.5 only) writefln Segmentation fault if no > globals", I think we should release a beta immediately. > > In particular, I think std.datetime should wait for the next cycle. > > If there are any known blockers, please list them now! |
December 15, 2010 [phobos] I thought we were about to release a beta? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to SHOO | On 13 December 2010 19:05, SHOO <zan77137 at nifty.com> wrote: > Because the bug that should be repaired was discovered, I report it. > > dmd(trunk r804) crashes by the compilation of Phobos with following flags: > > DFLAGS=-unittest -d -g -debug I can confirm that on Windows. But, it's not a regression. Using the DMD2.050 compiler and the current phobos, it does exactly the same thing. I believe it's the same capacity bug we've seen before. Is it the same as bug 4904 / bug 3372 ? http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/phobos/2010-September/002741.html |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation