Thread overview | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 28, 2011 [phobos] problem solved | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
I found the solution on the net. Apparently I need to add -L-lrt to the flags. Probably this should be documented somewhere... Andrei |
January 27, 2011 [phobos] problem solved | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | On Thursday 27 January 2011 22:16:28 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I found the solution on the net. Apparently I need to add -L-lrt to the flags.
>
> Probably this should be documented somewhere...
More like it needs to be fixed in the default dmd.conf. This will be broken for everyone on Linux if it's not in there.
- Jonathan M Davis
|
January 28, 2011 [phobos] problem solved | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jonathan M Davis | And while we're at it... that should be .dmdconf, not dmd.conf. It's time to polish all aspects of the installation.
Andrei
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 27 January 2011 22:16:28 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> I found the solution on the net. Apparently I need to add -L-lrt to the flags.
>>
>> Probably this should be documented somewhere...
>
> More like it needs to be fixed in the default dmd.conf. This will be broken for everyone on Linux if it's not in there.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
|
January 27, 2011 [phobos] problem solved | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | Only when it's a file in the users home dir, which isn't how we ship it. I find it much nicer as a file in the same dir as the executable. This makes it very easy to switch between binaries.
I do like the suggestion of adding $HOME/.dmd.conf (or some variation there on) to the list of files searched for. But auto-creating one there? not so much.
On 1/27/2011 10:32 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> And while we're at it... that should be .dmdconf, not dmd.conf. It's time to polish all aspects of the installation.
>
> Andrei
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote:
>> On Thursday 27 January 2011 22:16:28 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> I found the solution on the net. Apparently I need to add -L-lrt to the flags.
>>>
>>> Probably this should be documented somewhere...
>>
>> More like it needs to be fixed in the default dmd.conf. This will be broken for everyone on Linux if it's not in there.
>>
>> - Jonathan M Davis
|
January 27, 2011 [phobos] problem solved | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Brad Roberts | On Thursday 27 January 2011 22:47:17 Brad Roberts wrote:
> Only when it's a file in the users home dir, which isn't how we ship it. I find it much nicer as a file in the same dir as the executable. This makes it very easy to switch between binaries.
>
> I do like the suggestion of adding $HOME/.dmd.conf (or some variation there on) to the list of files searched for. But auto-creating one there? not so much.
I think that Andrei meant that it should be rename .dmd.conf where it currently is. Being able to but it in $HOME would be great as well, but that would be in addition to renaming it. I believe that there's a feature request open for that (having it in $HOME) at the moment, and IIRC it even had a patch to do it. However, renaming it doesn't have to be related to allowing it in $HOME.
- Jonathan M Davis
|
January 28, 2011 [phobos] problem solved | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Brad Roberts | Agreed.
Andrei
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com> wrote:
> Only when it's a file in the users home dir, which isn't how we ship it. ?I find it much nicer as a file in the same dir as the executable. ?This makes it very easy to switch between binaries.
>
> I do like the suggestion of adding $HOME/.dmd.conf (or some variation there on) to the list of files searched for. ?But auto-creating one there? ?not so much.
>
> On 1/27/2011 10:32 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> And while we're at it... that should be .dmdconf, not dmd.conf. It's time to polish all aspects of the installation.
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote:
>>> On Thursday 27 January 2011 22:16:28 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>> I found the solution on the net. Apparently I need to add -L-lrt to the flags.
>>>>
>>>> Probably this should be documented somewhere...
>>>
>>> More like it needs to be fixed in the default dmd.conf. This will be broken for everyone on Linux if it's not in there.
>>>
>>> - Jonathan M Davis
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
|
January 28, 2011 [phobos] problem solved | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu |
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> And while we're at it... that should be .dmdconf, not dmd.conf. It's time to polish all aspects of the installation.
>
>
I've never liked the configuration files being hidden. It's freaking annoying.
BTW, the Windows convention is to store your configuration in the system registry. We do not do that. Nobody has yet complained about this (in the entire history of dmd and dmc). In fact, they /*like*/ that dmc/dmd do not put settings in the system registry.
|
January 28, 2011 [phobos] problem solved | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | On 01/28/2011 02:40 AM, Walter Bright wrote: > > > Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> And while we're at it... that should be .dmdconf, not dmd.conf. It's time to polish all aspects of the installation. >> > > I've never liked the configuration files being hidden. It's freaking annoying. It doesn't quite matter what you and I like or not. Everybody on Unix does it that way ever since .profile. The presence of dmd.conf has "these morons think they're special" written all over it. So please let's not be gratuitously strident. > BTW, the Windows convention is to store your configuration in the system registry. We do not do that. Nobody has yet complained about this (in the entire history of dmd and dmc). In fact, they /*like*/ that dmc/dmd do not put settings in the system registry. The registry sucks. Most users hate it, and many applications are refusing to use it. It's definitely not a good comparison. Andrei |
January 28, 2011 [phobos] problem solved | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 09:14:26AM -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> It doesn't quite matter what you and I like or not. Everybody on Unix does it that way ever since .profile.
If the file is in $HOME, and sometimes if in the current working directory.
program.conf is common if the file resides in its own directory (including dot directories under home) or /etc.
The website lists these locations:
1.current working directory
2.directory specified by the HOME environment variable
3.directory dmd resides in
4./etc/
(1) and (2) might be renamed, but (3) and (4) certainly shouldn't be.
|
January 28, 2011 [phobos] problem solved | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Adam D. Ruppe | Correct. That's what I've always meant: only hide the file in $HOME.
Andrei
On 1/28/11 9:21 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 09:14:26AM -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> It doesn't quite matter what you and I like or not. Everybody on Unix does it that way ever since .profile.
>
> If the file is in $HOME, and sometimes if in the current working directory.
>
> program.conf is common if the file resides in its own directory (including dot directories under home) or /etc.
>
> The website lists these locations:
>
> 1.current working directory
> 2.directory specified by the HOME environment variable
> 3.directory dmd resides in
> 4./etc/
>
> (1) and (2) might be renamed, but (3) and (4) certainly shouldn't be.
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation