Thread overview
[dmd-internals] ModuleInfoDeclaration and Module::moduleinfo
Apr 23, 2013
Iain Buclaw
Apr 23, 2013
Walter Bright
Apr 23, 2013
Iain Buclaw
April 23, 2013
Just a quick question before I raise a pull.

I had noticed that 'struct ModuleInfoDeclaration' is currently unused (and looks to have been for a couple of years now).  Is there still a need to keep it?


Also, 'Module::moduleinfo' is now a StructDeclaration since turning on MODULEINFO_IS_STRUCT (again, this has been the case for some time too).  So this will need to be updated as well...   I am particularly interested in this small fix as I could use it in gdc.


Regards
-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';


April 23, 2013
On 4/23/2013 2:43 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Just a quick question before I raise a pull.
>
> I had noticed that 'struct ModuleInfoDeclaration' is currently unused (and looks to have been for a couple of years now).  Is there still a need to keep it?

No.

>
>
> Also, 'Module::moduleinfo' is now a StructDeclaration since turning on MODULEINFO_IS_STRUCT (again, this has been the case for some time too).  So this will need to be updated as well...   I am particularly interested in this small fix as I could use it in gdc.
>
>
> Regards
> -- 
> Iain Buclaw
>
> *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-internals mailing list
> dmd-internals@puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals



April 23, 2013
On 23 April 2013 18:44, Walter Bright <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote:

>
> On 4/23/2013 2:43 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
>  Just a quick question before I raise a pull.
>
> I had noticed that 'struct ModuleInfoDeclaration' is currently unused (and looks to have been for a couple of years now).  Is there still a need to keep it?
>
>
> No.
>

Okie doke.


-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';