Thread overview
[dmd-beta] beta 3
Jul 09, 2011
Walter Bright
Jul 10, 2011
David Simcha
Jul 10, 2011
Daniel Murphy
Jul 10, 2011
Daniel Murphy
Jul 10, 2011
Daniel Murphy
Jul 10, 2011
Stephan Dilly
Jul 10, 2011
Stephan Dilly
Jul 10, 2011
Sönke Ludwig
July 09, 2011
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip

1. This has a working rdmd in it, but why the other one failed is still under
investigation. It appears to be a heisenbug.
2. weak purity restored
3. latest druntime and phobos folded in
4. Don's ctfe fix
July 09, 2011
What about the two regressions I found?  I'm not sure they're severe enough to hold up the release, though.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6264 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6267


On 7/9/2011 7:34 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>
> 1. This has a working rdmd in it, but why the other one failed is
> still under investigation. It appears to be a heisenbug.
> 2. weak purity restored
> 3. latest druntime and phobos folded in
> 4. Don's ctfe fix
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>

July 10, 2011
Fix for 6264: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/224

On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:47 AM, David Simcha <dsimcha at gmail.com> wrote:
> What about the two regressions I found? ?I'm not sure they're severe enough to hold up the release, though.
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6264 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6267
>
>
> On 7/9/2011 7:34 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>>
>> 1. This has a working rdmd in it, but why the other one failed is still
>> under investigation. It appears to be a heisenbug.
>> 2. weak purity restored
>> 3. latest druntime and phobos folded in
>> 4. Don's ctfe fix
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-beta mailing list
>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
July 10, 2011
Fix for 6267: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/225

On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Daniel Murphy <yebblies at gmail.com> wrote:
> Fix for 6264: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/224
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:47 AM, David Simcha <dsimcha at gmail.com> wrote:
>> What about the two regressions I found? ?I'm not sure they're severe enough to hold up the release, though.
>>
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6264 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6267
>>
>>
>> On 7/9/2011 7:34 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>>
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>>>
>>> 1. This has a working rdmd in it, but why the other one failed is still
>>> under investigation. It appears to be a heisenbug.
>>> 2. weak purity restored
>>> 3. latest druntime and phobos folded in
>>> 4. Don's ctfe fix
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmd-beta mailing list
>>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-beta mailing list
>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>
>
July 10, 2011
Fix for 6279: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/226

On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Murphy <yebblies at gmail.com> wrote:
> Fix for 6267: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/225
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Daniel Murphy <yebblies at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Fix for 6264: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/224
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:47 AM, David Simcha <dsimcha at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> What about the two regressions I found? ?I'm not sure they're severe enough to hold up the release, though.
>>>
>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6264 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6267
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/9/2011 7:34 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>>>
>>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>>>>
>>>> 1. This has a working rdmd in it, but why the other one failed is still
>>>> under investigation. It appears to be a heisenbug.
>>>> 2. weak purity restored
>>>> 3. latest druntime and phobos folded in
>>>> 4. Don's ctfe fix
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dmd-beta mailing list
>>>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmd-beta mailing list
>>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>>
>>
>
July 10, 2011
In one of my projects i get this error using the std.json module:

phobos\std\json.d(62): Error: function std.json.parseJSON!(string).parseJSON compiler error, parameter 'json', bugzilla 2962?

I did not yet get to reduce my code that uses parseJSON to reproduce it, perhaps someone has an idea anyway.



On 10.07.2011 01:34, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>
> 1. This has a working rdmd in it, but why the other one failed is still
> under investigation. It appears to be a heisenbug.
> 2. weak purity restored
> 3. latest druntime and phobos folded in
> 4. Don's ctfe fix
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
July 10, 2011
Ok i forgot to mention that this error is thrown from glue.c(749) right b4 dmd asserts, which i think is kinda messy. why bother throwing an error and still assert then ?


On 10.07.2011 14:07, Stephan Dilly wrote:
> In one of my projects i get this error using the std.json module:
>
> phobos\std\json.d(62): Error: function
> std.json.parseJSON!(string).parseJSON compiler error, parameter 'json',
> bugzilla 2962?
>
> I did not yet get to reduce my code that uses parseJSON to reproduce it, perhaps someone has an idea anyway.
>
>
>
> On 10.07.2011 01:34, Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>>
>> 1. This has a working rdmd in it, but why the other one failed is still
>> under investigation. It appears to be a heisenbug.
>> 2. weak purity restored
>> 3. latest druntime and phobos folded in
>> 4. Don's ctfe fix
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-beta mailing list
>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
July 10, 2011
I am getting the same error message in conjunction with std.conv.parse!(real) in about 80% of cases when I use to!double or parse!double since about 2 or 3 versions. I'm using good old atof() now.

Another problem are "multiple definition of XX" linker errors that are occuring more and more from release to release - fortunately single-file compilation is a workaround in mose cases...

Am 10.07.2011 14:10, schrieb Stephan Dilly:
> Ok i forgot to mention that this error is thrown from glue.c(749) right b4 dmd asserts, which i think is kinda messy. why bother throwing an error and still assert then ?
>
>
> On 10.07.2011 14:07, Stephan Dilly wrote:
>> In one of my projects i get this error using the std.json module:
>>
>> phobos\std\json.d(62): Error: function
>> std.json.parseJSON!(string).parseJSON compiler error, parameter 'json',
>> bugzilla 2962?
>>
>> I did not yet get to reduce my code that uses parseJSON to reproduce it, perhaps someone has an idea anyway.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10.07.2011 01:34, Walter Bright wrote:
>>>
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>>>
>>> 1. This has a working rdmd in it, but why the other one failed is still
>>> under investigation. It appears to be a heisenbug.
>>> 2. weak purity restored
>>> 3. latest druntime and phobos folded in
>>> 4. Don's ctfe fix
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmd-beta mailing list
>>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-beta mailing list
>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta