March 11, 2002 Re: Unicode nonsense? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to OddesE | "OddesE" <OddesE_XYZ@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:a6j1gd$1j91$1@digitaldaemon.com... > LOL! > I guess D was expressing his open mind, calling Unicode > nonsense, therefore banning Japanese, Chinese, Russian, > Turkish etc. etc. etc. users to use paper and pen for ever! > :) Well, Russian users prefer Windows-1251 or KOI8-R anyhow, I guess nobody here cares about the UNICODE, in fact... =) |
March 11, 2002 Re: Unicode nonsense? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Pavel Minayev | "Pavel Minayev" <evilone@omen.ru> wrote in message news:a6j535$1kpr$1@digitaldaemon.com... > "OddesE" <OddesE_XYZ@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:a6j1gd$1j91$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > LOL! > > I guess D was expressing his open mind, calling Unicode > > nonsense, therefore banning Japanese, Chinese, Russian, > > Turkish etc. etc. etc. users to use paper and pen for ever! > > :) > > Well, Russian users prefer Windows-1251 or KOI8-R anyhow, I guess nobody here cares about the UNICODE, in fact... =) > > Oh... Well, another dream of unification shattered then... :) -- Stijn OddesE_XYZ@hotmail.com http://OddesE.cjb.net __________________________________________ Remove _XYZ from my address when replying by mail |
March 11, 2002 Re: Operator overloading (was D complex) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to H. Ellenberger | On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 12:50:21 +0100, H. Ellenberger wrote:
> Walter wrote:
>
>> "John Fletcher" <J.P.Fletcher@aston.ac.uk> wrote in message news:3C512862.EB749F7A@aston.ac.uk...
>> > I am interested to see that D has a built in complex. [...] How can a complex number value be output?
>>
>> A printf with z.re, z.im.
>
> Yet annother reason why I strongly advocate for classes and operator overloading.
>
> The benefits:
>
> - Ordinary math syntax for complex calculation for _all_ kind of base
> type
> - IO can be overloaded to use same syntax as ordinary numbers - And most
As complex is a builtin type, shouldn't all the standard operators just work as expected ? (my 2 euro cents)
Jakob Kemi
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation