Is Bright (D) to the point where it makes sense to talk about versions?  I am not talking about the "version" keyword.  That is another GREAT idea, but different.

I would like to see comments like "That construction sundowned in version 0.0.0.1".

Andy Walker
jawalker@stl.quik.com

What do you mean? The version statement also will work for language extensions.

"Andy Walker" <Andy_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:acua7u$2u47$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Is Bright (D) to the point where it makes sense to talk about versions?  I
am
> not talking about the "version" keyword.  That is another GREAT idea, but different.
>
> I would like to see comments like "That construction sundowned in version 0.0.0.1".
>
> Andy Walker
> jawalker@stl.quik.com

"Andy Walker" <Andy_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:acua7u$2u47$1@digitaldaemon.com...

> Is Bright (D) to the point where it makes sense to talk about versions?  I
am
> not talking about the "version" keyword.  That is another GREAT idea, but different.
>
> I would like to see comments like "That construction sundowned in version 0.0.0.1".

Well, it already had pointer declaration syntax changed, then comparison ops, and also some functions are deprecated (string.toCharz, for instance). I don't remember the version numbers, though.