I revamped the disp documentation so it is semi-usable now.

www.digitalmars.com/rtl/disp.html

In article <a983fj$2mim$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
>
>I revamped the disp documentation so it is semi-usable now.
>
>www.digitalmars.com/rtl/disp.html
>
>
>
Are the same services available through int86, interrupt 0x10? I'd like to have a solution that was buildable by other compilers, also.

> Are the same services available through int86, interrupt 0x10? I'd like to have a solution that was buildable by other compilers, also.

#ifdef __DMC__
    // use disp
#else
    // use other.
#endif

Jan

In article <3D1B6217.BABAB728@smartsoft.cc>, Jan Knepper says...
>
>> Are the same services available through int86, interrupt 0x10? I'd like to have a solution that was buildable by other compilers, also.
>
>#ifdef __DMC__
>    // use disp
>#else
>    // use other.
>#endif
>
>Jan
>
>
I take it that means the answer is no. I think I'll just use embedded assembler instead, because I don't want the nightmare of maintaining changes in two different places. Your compiler does support embedded assembler, doesn't it?

"Adrian Cole" <Adrian_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:afftpo$2nq7$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> I take it that means the answer is no. I think I'll just use embedded
assembler
> instead, because I don't want the nightmare of maintaining changes in two different places. Your compiler does support embedded assembler, doesn't
it?

It sure does!

-Walter