Given -preview=nosharedaccess on the command line, "hello world" fails to compile (you are referred to core.atomic ...).

What is the idiomatic way to get writeln style output from a nosharedaccess program?

Is separate compilation the way to go?

On 6/30/20 3:56 PM, Bruce Carneal wrote:
> Given -preview=nosharedaccess on the command line, "hello world" fails to compile (you are referred to core.atomic ...).
> 
> What is the idiomatic way to get writeln style output from a nosharedaccess program?
> 
> Is separate compilation the way to go?
> 

writeln uses the shared stdout.

The answer is -- update Phobos so it works with -nosharedaccess :)

-Steve

On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 20:04:33 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:

> The answer is -- update Phobos so it works with -nosharedaccess :)

Yeah... and dip1000. And dip1008. And dip<yournumberhere>... :)

On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 20:12:59 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
> On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 20:04:33 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>
>> The answer is -- update Phobos so it works with -nosharedaccess :)
>
> Yeah... and dip1000. And dip1008. And dip<yournumberhere>... :)

Didn't want to be snippity but, yeah, with "hello world" breaking I thought it was time to fix the standard library.  Thanks for the polite confirmation(s).

On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 20:43:00 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote:
> On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 20:12:59 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 20:04:33 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>
>>> The answer is -- update Phobos so it works with -nosharedaccess :)
>>
>> Yeah... and dip1000. And dip1008. And dip<yournumberhere>... :)
>
> Didn't want to be snippity but, yeah, with "hello world" breaking I thought it was time to fix the standard library.  Thanks for the polite confirmation(s).

Looking at the stdio.d source it appears that a cast on one line within a template could give nosharedaccess programs access to stdio, stdout, and stderr.

A bug/enhancement request was filed.