Yes, but the exact syntax is an open question. Haven't thought too much about it yet.

"Mike Wynn" <mike.wynn@l8night.co.uk> wrote in message news:aou3m6$17qj$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> will you been about to do ...
>
> array[] = [ void anon(Bar arg) {...},
>                     void anon(Bar arg) {...},
>                     void anon(Bar arg) {...} ];
>
> ?

Do either Walter or Burton think that D is sufficiently progressed to the point that a D compiler could be written in D?

Sean

Sean L. Palmer wrote:
> Do either Walter or Burton think that D is sufficiently progressed to the
> point that a D compiler could be written in D?

It is and would be quite a lot simpler than the current compiler.  The main problem with DMD here is that it doesn't handle recursive importing very nicely.

"Sean L. Palmer" <seanpalmer@directvinternet.com> wrote in message news:aovoh2$2pko$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Do either Walter or Burton think that D is sufficiently progressed to the point that a D compiler could be written in D?

Yes it has.

"Burton Radons" <loth@users.sourceforge.net> wrote in message news:ap08iv$752$2@digitaldaemon.com...
> The
> main problem with DMD here is that it doesn't handle recursive importing
> very nicely.

Please expand on this, so I can address it.