http://www.cuj.com/experts/2002/sutter.htm

"...There are still some C99 features, however, that C++0x cannot easily adopt in their C99 form, because conflicting facilities already exist in C++98..."


So right now I would take STL namespace support and let the C99 / C0x stuff drift a while in its place.  Namespaces are what people use *today*.

Mark

"Mark Evans" <Mark_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:as98i7$2853$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> http://www.cuj.com/experts/2002/sutter.htm
> "...There are still some C99 features, however, that C++0x cannot easily
adopt
> in their C99 form, because conflicting facilities already exist in
C++98..."
> So right now I would take STL namespace support and let the C99 / C0x
stuff
> drift a while in its place.  Namespaces are what people use *today*.

I've been working on the namespace support, it's getting a lot better. ADL lookup is still nowhere, though.