>I don't have anything against Qt. It is a great thing, but it has its limitations.
>Are you aware of any popular commercial Windows software written using
>Qt?..

We use a product (VectorCAST) at work that developed it's GUI with Qt. They are
a small outfit and they need to support Windows and UNIX/Linux platforms.
As long as you are not doing pixel level type stuff then cross-platform GUI is a
great way to achieve easy portability. It basically has a Windows "look and
feel" on each platform.

Mark T wrote:
>>I don't have anything against Qt. It is a great thing, but it has its limitations.
>>Are you aware of any popular commercial Windows software written using
>>Qt?..

Not directly. Delphi's complete windows GUI class libarary was ported to other systems (Kylix for Linux) using Qt. It is said to reatain its complete functionality. I'm pretty much sure, that the GUI library that would resemble Delphi's would be good for D, since it contains no windows-specifics, and there has been done a lot: an X windows port made for FPK pascal already exists and is open-source, which may simplify further development.