Which or both of these syntaxes are legal for declaring a varargs function?

	void foo(char a, ...) {;};
	void foo(char a...) {;};

"Russell Lewis" <spamhole-2001-07-16@deming-os.org> escribió en el mensaje
news:3E2DA027.8070308@deming-os.org...
| Which or both of these syntaxes are legal for declaring a varargs
function?
|
| void foo(char a, ...) {;};
| void foo(char a...) {;};
|

the first

-------------------------
Carlos Santander
http://carlos3.netfirms.com/
"Russell Lewis" <spamhole-2001-07-16@deming-os.org> escribió en el mensaje
news:3E2DA027.8070308@deming-os.org...
| Which or both of these syntaxes are legal for declaring a varargs
function?
|
| void foo(char a, ...) {;};
| void foo(char a...) {;};
|

the first

-------------------------
Carlos Santander
http://carlos3.netfirms.com/

Carlos wrote:
> "Russell Lewis" <spamhole-2001-07-16@deming-os.org> escribió en el mensaje
> news:3E2DA027.8070308@deming-os.org...
> | Which or both of these syntaxes are legal for declaring a varargs
> function?
> |
> | void foo(char a, ...) {;};
> | void foo(char a...) {;};
> |
> 
> the first

That was my thought, though I wanted Walter to confirm it.

Also, if anybody has the latest version of DMD, can you check things:
  * Does DMD allow you to use the 2nd syntax?
  * Does the declaration of
        char[] fmt(char[] format, generic[] args...)
    in phobos/format.d still use the 2nd syntax?  I have an old copy of phobos (the one I got when I installed DLI 0.1.2), and it has that.

"Russell Lewis" <spamhole-2001-07-16@deming-os.org> escribió en el mensaje
news:3E2DA498.30209@deming-os.org...
| Carlos wrote:
| > "Russell Lewis" <spamhole-2001-07-16@deming-os.org> escribió en el
mensaje
| > news:3E2DA027.8070308@deming-os.org...
| > | Which or both of these syntaxes are legal for declaring a varargs
| > function?
| > |
| > | void foo(char a, ...) {;};
| > | void foo(char a...) {;};
| > |
| >
| > the first
|
| That was my thought, though I wanted Walter to confirm it.
|
| Also, if anybody has the latest version of DMD, can you check things:
|    * Does DMD allow you to use the 2nd syntax?

no, it doesn't

|    * Does the declaration of
|          char[] fmt(char[] format, generic[] args...)
|      in phobos/format.d still use the 2nd syntax?  I have an old copy of
| phobos (the one I got when I installed DLI 0.1.2), and it has that.
|

dli supports that, but dmd doesn't, AFAIR

-------------------------
Carlos Santander
http://carlos3.netfirms.com/


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 2003-01-21

> Also, if anybody has the latest version of DMD, can you check things:
>    * Does DMD allow you to use the 2nd syntax?
>    * Does the declaration of
>          char[] fmt(char[] format, generic[] args...)
>      in phobos/format.d still use the 2nd syntax?  I have an old copy of
> phobos (the one I got when I installed DLI 0.1.2), and it has that.
>

No...It does not work.