Hi, I don't know if this happens with other structures (don't have time to check), but why can't I put a try {} catch {} inside a with {}? I know you could say "put the with inside the try", but I already did that and I didn't get what I expected, so I'm going for the other way. Is it intentional or was also overlooked? (like using structs instead of classes as a with parameter --is it the way to say?).

-------------------------
Carlos Santander


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.471 / Virus Database: 269 - Release Date: 2003-04-10

"Carlos Santander B." <carlos8294@msn.com> wrote in message news:b7fup8$1jgf$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Hi, I don't know if this happens with other structures (don't have time to check), but why can't I put a try {} catch {} inside a with {}? I know you could say "put the with inside the try", but I already did that and I
didn't
> get what I expected, so I'm going for the other way. Is it intentional or was also overlooked? (like using structs instead of classes as a with parameter --is it the way to say?).

That was a bug, I think I have it fixed now. -Walter