Thread overview | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 08, 2003 DMD 0.66 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Many minor bugs fixed. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html |
June 09, 2003 Re: DMD 0.66 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | I've been wanting to ask this for a couple of weeks now, and now I feel it's a good time to do so. Are there any major changes expected in the language design? Because I'm starting to believe that it could be a good moment to have a final release. What do you all think? ————————————————————————— Carlos Santander --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.488 / Virus Database: 287 - Release Date: 2003-06-05 |
June 09, 2003 Re: DMD 0.66 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc0d2j$20r6$1 @digitaldaemon.com:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
What happened to the -o option? It used to
let me set the obj file directory.
|
June 09, 2003 Re: DMD 0.66 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Patrick Down | "Patrick Down" <pat@codemoon.com> wrote in message news:Xns9394EC4C4963patcodemooncom@63.105.9.61... > "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc0d2j$20r6$1 @digitaldaemon.com: > > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html > > What happened to the -o option? It used to > let me set the obj file directory. Hmm. Nothing should have happened to it! |
June 09, 2003 Re: DMD 0.66 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc13ci$2k3c$1 @digitaldaemon.com: > > "Patrick Down" <pat@codemoon.com> wrote in message news:Xns9394EC4C4963patcodemooncom@63.105.9.61... >> "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc0d2j$20r6$1 @digitaldaemon.com: >> >> > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html >> >> What happened to the -o option? It used to >> let me set the obj file directory. > > Hmm. Nothing should have happened to it! The "help" listed below has two definitions for it and "-o filename name output file" seems to be the fuctionality now. Digital Mars D Compiler Beta v0.65 Copyright (c) 1999-2003 by Digital Mars written by Walter Bright www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html Usage: dmd files.d ... { -switch } files.d D source files -c do not link -d allow deprecated features -g add symbolic debug info -gt add trace profiling hooks -v verbose -O optimize -oobjdir write object files to directory objdir -o filename name output file -Ipath where to look for imports -Llinkerflag pass linkerflag to link -debug compile in debug code -debug=level compile in debug code <= level -debug=ident compile in debug code identified by ident -inline do function inlining -release compile release version -unittest compile in unit tests -version=level compile in version code >= level -version=ident compile in version code identified by ident |
June 09, 2003 Re: DMD 0.66 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Patrick Down | Are you using the windows or linux version? "Patrick Down" <pat@codemoon.com> wrote in message news:Xns939555016675patcodemooncom@63.105.9.61... > "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc13ci$2k3c$1 @digitaldaemon.com: > > > > > "Patrick Down" <pat@codemoon.com> wrote in message news:Xns9394EC4C4963patcodemooncom@63.105.9.61... > >> "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc0d2j$20r6$1 @digitaldaemon.com: > >> > >> > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html > >> > >> What happened to the -o option? It used to > >> let me set the obj file directory. > > > > Hmm. Nothing should have happened to it! > > The "help" listed below has two definitions for it > and "-o filename name output file" seems to be > the fuctionality now. > > Digital Mars D Compiler Beta v0.65 > Copyright (c) 1999-2003 by Digital Mars written by Walter Bright > www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html > Usage: > dmd files.d ... { -switch } > > files.d D source files > -c do not link > -d allow deprecated features > -g add symbolic debug info > -gt add trace profiling hooks > -v verbose > -O optimize > -oobjdir write object files to directory objdir > -o filename name output file > -Ipath where to look for imports > -Llinkerflag pass linkerflag to link > -debug compile in debug code > -debug=level compile in debug code <= level > -debug=ident compile in debug code identified by ident > -inline do function inlining > -release compile release version > -unittest compile in unit tests > -version=level compile in version code >= level > -version=ident compile in version code identified by ident |
June 09, 2003 Re: DMD 0.66 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | In article <bc2b9u$n5v$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says... > >Are you using the windows or linux version? > Windows |
June 09, 2003 Re: DMD 0.66 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Patrick Down | "Patrick Down" <Patrick_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bc2bj8$nhv$1@digitaldaemon.com... > In article <bc2b9u$n5v$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says... > > > >Are you using the windows or linux version? > Windows Here's how it works. If linking, the -o is assumed to be the executable file name. If not linking, and the filename ends in .obj, it is assumed to be the output .obj name. Otherwise, it is taken to be the output directory. |
June 09, 2003 Re: DMD 0.66 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | In article <bc2i1i$tu0$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says... > > >"Patrick Down" <Patrick_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bc2bj8$nhv$1@digitaldaemon.com... >> In article <bc2b9u$n5v$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says... >> > >> >Are you using the windows or linux version? >> Windows > >Here's how it works. If linking, the -o is assumed to be the executable file name. If not linking, and the filename ends in .obj, it is assumed to be the output .obj name. Otherwise, it is taken to be the output directory. Ok, I understand. But it would seem desirable to have a separate flag for the output file and intermediate dicrectory. |
June 09, 2003 Re: DMD 0.66 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Patrick Down | "Patrick Down" <Patrick_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bc2ml4$12aj$1@digitaldaemon.com... > In article <bc2i1i$tu0$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says... > > > > > >"Patrick Down" <Patrick_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bc2bj8$nhv$1@digitaldaemon.com... > >> In article <bc2b9u$n5v$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says... > >> > > >> >Are you using the windows or linux version? > >> Windows > > > >Here's how it works. If linking, the -o is assumed to be the executable file > >name. If not linking, and the filename ends in .obj, it is assumed to be the > >output .obj name. Otherwise, it is taken to be the output directory. > > Ok, I understand. But it would seem desirable to have a separate flag for the > output file and intermediate dicrectory. You're right, it is a little confusing. |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation