July 02, 2003 Re: Warnings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Matthew Wilson | Maybe DMC++ will begin using STLPort natively rather than SGI =) <winks at Walter> "Matthew Wilson" <matthew@stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bdt3sp$vab$1@digitaldaemon.com... > STLSoft supports DMC++, and DMC++ supports SGI & STLport, so STLSoft must do > also. > > "Greg Peet" <admin@gregpeet.com> wrote in message news:bdt2r2$u2h$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > Then don't support SGI's STL. Simple! > > > > =P > > > > > > "Matthew Wilson" <matthew@stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bdr958$2572$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > I do. However I'm currently writing test projects and makefiles for the > > next > > > release of STLSoft, and they have to be compatible with all reasonable permutations of compilers/libraries. > > > > > > "Wichetael" <wichetael@gmx.net> wrote in message news:bdr4jg$20vr$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > > How about using STLport instead, I never had any problems with that > > > myself. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Remko van der Vossen. > > > > > > > > "Matthew Wilson" <matthew@stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bdqf4r$1aar$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > > > Doing that in my own code doesn't help anyone who then uses the same > > > > > makefiles for their own downloaded versions of DMC++, with the > flawed > > > STL > > > > > files. > > > > > > > > > > If you mean fix the STL files at source, then I guess that's up to > > > Walter > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > "Wichetael" <wichetael@gmx.net> wrote in message news:bdq5ub$10i5$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > > > > Uh, fix the code so that it always return a value... :p > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, couldn't help myself... > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Remko van der Vossen > > > > > > > > > > > > "Matthew Wilson" <matthew@stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bdnn63$17dq$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > > > > > One other thing ... is there a way to do it in code? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Richard Grant" <fractal@clark.net> wrote in message news:bdn8nm$nr2$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > > > > > > In article <bdlqba$2enr$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Matthew Wilson > > > says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Is there a way to specify to the compiler to suppress certain > > > > > warnings? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -w[errno] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > like -w18 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
July 02, 2003 Re: Warnings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Greg Peet | Still backwards compatibility to consider ... Stop trying to make my life easier!! Martin the masochist "Greg Peet" <admin@gregpeet.com> wrote in message news:bdt7at$133t$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Maybe DMC++ will begin using STLPort natively rather than SGI =) <winks at Walter> > > "Matthew Wilson" <matthew@stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bdt3sp$vab$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > STLSoft supports DMC++, and DMC++ supports SGI & STLport, so STLSoft must > do > > also. > > > > "Greg Peet" <admin@gregpeet.com> wrote in message news:bdt2r2$u2h$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > Then don't support SGI's STL. Simple! > > > > > > =P > > > > > > > > > "Matthew Wilson" <matthew@stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bdr958$2572$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > > I do. However I'm currently writing test projects and makefiles for > the > > > next > > > > release of STLSoft, and they have to be compatible with all reasonable > > > > permutations of compilers/libraries. > > > > > > > > "Wichetael" <wichetael@gmx.net> wrote in message news:bdr4jg$20vr$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > > > How about using STLport instead, I never had any problems with that > > > > myself. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Remko van der Vossen. > > > > > > > > > > "Matthew Wilson" <matthew@stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bdqf4r$1aar$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > > > > Doing that in my own code doesn't help anyone who then uses the > same > > > > > > makefiles for their own downloaded versions of DMC++, with the > > flawed > > > > STL > > > > > > files. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you mean fix the STL files at source, then I guess that's up to > > > > Walter > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > "Wichetael" <wichetael@gmx.net> wrote in message news:bdq5ub$10i5$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > > > > > Uh, fix the code so that it always return a value... :p > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, couldn't help myself... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Remko van der Vossen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Matthew Wilson" <matthew@stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bdnn63$17dq$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > > > > > > One other thing ... is there a way to do it in code? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Richard Grant" <fractal@clark.net> wrote in message news:bdn8nm$nr2$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > > > > > > > In article <bdlqba$2enr$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Matthew Wilson > > > > says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Is there a way to specify to the compiler to suppress > certain > > > > > > warnings? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -w[errno] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > like -w18 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
July 04, 2003 Re: Warnings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Greg Peet | "Greg Peet" <admin@gregpeet.com> wrote in message news:bdt7at$133t$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Maybe DMC++ will begin using STLPort natively rather than SGI =) <winks at Walter> STLport is not the default because it slows down compilation. |
July 07, 2003 Re: Warnings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:be2jmp$s8s$1@digitaldaemon.com... > STLport is not the default because it slows down compilation. Wow really? Is it just the iostreams or the whole STL? |
July 07, 2003 Re: Warnings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Greg Peet | "Greg Peet" <admin@gregpeet.com> wrote in message news:beb91c$2sau$1@digitaldaemon.com... > "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:be2jmp$s8s$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > STLport is not the default because it slows down compilation. > Wow really? Is it just the iostreams or the whole STL? It's all the extra file lookups. |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation