November 14 Re: Avoid subtracting form .length | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to user1234 | On Thursday, 14 November 2024 at 17:27:54 UTC, user1234 wrote: >You define a contract that Dscanner does not understand. The more simple solution, as you seem to be careful about bounds, is to disable the specific check that worries you. Ok. Somewhat sad, but at least it works. | |||
November 15 Re: Avoid subtracting form .length | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to Dom DiSc | On Thursday, 14 November 2024 at 13:24:47 UTC, Dom DiSc wrote: > No, no. My problem is: [...] So it seems, that the intended problem was transposed into some example, thereby oblittering that problem with some coding errors. > I checked that the source array has at least one element. Yes, but only for the purpose of the development of the code, because the used `assert' will probably not be compiled into a release binary. [...] > - What else is proposed to implement the desired effect > without warning? Maybe using an `if`-statement, which is propper for release too, instead of an `assert`-expression, which is propper for develeopment only? Please reconsider the docs at 11.19.10.9.1: https://dlang.org/spec/expression.html#assert_expressions | |||
November 18 Re: Avoid subtracting form .length | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to Manfred Nowak | On Thursday, 14 November 2024 at 13:08:36 UTC, Manfred Nowak wrote:
> On Saturday, 9 November 2024 at 04:02:46 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> [...]
>> b[0 .. a.length-1] = a[];
>>
>> You'll get a RangeError being thrown when you run the code.
> [...]
>
> Therefore a fix might be to not deminish the length:
> b[ 0 .. a.length]= a[];
>
> -manfred
Good Lord! Manfred Nowak? Is that really you?!
Everyone, we have the history of D in its full essence, dating back to 2004!
:-P It's great to see you here again, even if only from time to time!
| |||
Permalink
Reply
