Please implement the overloading of the function call operator.
Then array indexing could be a special case of that and this is also useful
elsewhere (function objects, random number generators).

I'm inclined to agree by (C++) instinct, but I think some example cases
would be good.

"mjm" <mjm_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bh8esq$1crg$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Please implement the overloading of the function call operator. Then array indexing could be a special case of that and this is also
useful
> elsewhere (function objects, random number generators).
>
>

mjm wrote:
> Please implement the overloading of the function call operator.
> Then array indexing could be a special case of that and this is also useful
> elsewhere (function objects, random number generators).

Won't closures also do?

And no, it's not good enough for array indexing, since it would be useful to distinguish between array element getter and setter!

-i.