Thread overview
delegates vs. function pointers.
Sep 14, 2003
Daniel Yokomiso
Sep 14, 2003
Walter
Sep 14, 2003
Daniel Yokomiso
Sep 14, 2003
Walter
September 14, 2003
Walter what's the current status of delegates and function pointers? AFAICT they're still different beasts, are you planning on unifying them?


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.516 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 1/9/2003


September 14, 2003
"Daniel Yokomiso" <daniel_yokomiso@yahoo.com.br> wrote in message news:bk0fu5$2p4k$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Walter what's the current status of delegates and function pointers?
AFAICT
> they're still different beasts, are you planning on unifying them?

Yes, I'm planning on unifying them. It's a chunk of work, though, because it will require runtime thunk generation and some mucking about with the gc.


September 14, 2003
"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> escreveu na mensagem news:bk10dc$dj3$2@digitaldaemon.com...
>
> "Daniel Yokomiso" <daniel_yokomiso@yahoo.com.br> wrote in message news:bk0fu5$2p4k$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > Walter what's the current status of delegates and function pointers?
> AFAICT
> > they're still different beasts, are you planning on unifying them?
>
> Yes, I'm planning on unifying them. It's a chunk of work, though, because
it
> will require runtime thunk generation and some mucking about with the gc.

Have you a schedule for it?


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.516 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 1/9/2003


September 14, 2003
"Daniel Yokomiso" <daniel_yokomiso@yahoo.com.br> wrote in message news:bk1rom$1ids$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> escreveu na mensagem news:bk10dc$dj3$2@digitaldaemon.com...
> >
> > "Daniel Yokomiso" <daniel_yokomiso@yahoo.com.br> wrote in message news:bk0fu5$2p4k$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > > Walter what's the current status of delegates and function pointers?
> > AFAICT
> > > they're still different beasts, are you planning on unifying them?
> >
> > Yes, I'm planning on unifying them. It's a chunk of work, though,
because
> it
> > will require runtime thunk generation and some mucking about with the
gc.
>
> Have you a schedule for it?

There's no schedule for anything <g>. Right now I'm working on bug fixes, after that, I was going to look at improving templates.