September 19, 2003 Re: DIDE .98 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Vathix | Hmm i think the uninstall will delete DMD, Ill check though I hope it doesnt delete anything! :) Charles "Vathix" <vathix@dprogramming.com> wrote in message news:bkfkom$2nv6$1@digitaldaemon.com... > It let me install it as non-administrator. I also uninstalled the "empty" version and it deleted DMD with it :P > > > "Charles Sanders" <sanders-consulting@comcast.net> wrote in message news:bkfkjs$2nf0$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > You have to have install permissions, just like you would installing any other program. I didn't set anything requiring Administrator though no. > > > > Charles > > "Vathix" <vathix@dprogramming.com> wrote in message > > news:bkfjvg$2lf6$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > It doesn't let me run it unless I'm an Administrator. Tells me "Fatal > > error > > > getting install information, please re-install DIDE". Is this > intentional? > > > why must I run as administrator? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
September 19, 2003 Re: DIDE .98 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Charles Sanders | Don't know how parse text/html message |
September 20, 2003 Re: DIDE .98 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Charles Sanders | In article <bkfi9d$2h95$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Charles Sanders says... >function isolating that function ? Not sure Im understand 100% about = the console thing. Probably something like in Visual Basic, where you can stop at a breakpoint and then type commands in the Console window and follow the variables in the Watch window. It really helps sometimes. |
September 20, 2003 Re: DIDE .98 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Charles Sanders | Is it possible to use DIDE without digc and DIG
for Windows programming?
Albin
Charles Sanders wrote:
> Its a bit pre-mature, a couple problems with the code browser and I plan to
> redo the interface but this will work with .69 and greater.
>
> For next release:
>
> Code Completeion
> Dide packages
> Project import / export
> Fix any bugs you report :)
>
> Id also like some feedback on what you think could be improved, and also
> some general ideas on what would make an IDE great, no matter how crazy or
> how difficult to implement.
>
> Thanks,
> Charles
>
>
|
September 20, 2003 Re: DIDE .98 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Alen Attachments:
| Alen wrote:
>In article <bkfi9d$2h95$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Charles Sanders says...
>
>
>>function isolating that function ? Not sure Im understand 100% about = the console thing.
>>
>>
>
>Probably something like in Visual Basic, where you can stop at a breakpoint and then type commands in the Console window and follow the variables in the Watch window. It really helps sometimes.
>
>
>
Yeah, that's close however, I don't just imply that the program needs to be stopped. It should be able to work without running/breaking the program, so you can test individual(and groups of) classes/methods.
-Anderson
|
September 20, 2003 Re: DIDE .98 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Albin Pucnik | Youll need at least DIGC, which is a great tool you should use it on the command line too. Charles "Albin Pucnik" <albin.pucnik@guest.arnes.si> wrote in message news:bkhbmu$199u$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Is it possible to use DIDE without digc and DIG > for Windows programming? > > Albin > > > Charles Sanders wrote: > > Its a bit pre-mature, a couple problems with the code browser and I plan to > > redo the interface but this will work with .69 and greater. > > > > For next release: > > > > Code Completeion > > Dide packages > > Project import / export > > Fix any bugs you report :) > > > > Id also like some feedback on what you think could be improved, and also some general ideas on what would make an IDE great, no matter how crazy or > > how difficult to implement. > > > > Thanks, > > Charles > > > > > |
September 21, 2003 Re: DIDE .98 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Charles Sanders | Charles Sanders wrote:
> Youll need at least DIGC, which is a great tool you should use it on the
> command line too.
>
> Charles
When compiling a non-DIG windows program in DIDE I get complaints
in the form of Error 42: Symbol Undefined, compiling the same
program with DMD works fine.
( I compiled the program winsamp.d from c:\dmd\samples\d ).
Albin
|
September 21, 2003 Re: DIDE .98 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Albin Pucnik | Thats odd, I compiled and got the same undefined errors with both DMD and DIG. What version of DIGC, DIDE, and dmd ? C "Albin Pucnik" <albin.pucnik@guest.arnes.si> wrote in message news:bkk865$54t$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Charles Sanders wrote: > > Youll need at least DIGC, which is a great tool you should use it on the command line too. > > > > Charles > > When compiling a non-DIG windows program in DIDE I get complaints > in the form of Error 42: Symbol Undefined, compiling the same > program with DMD works fine. > ( I compiled the program winsamp.d from c:\dmd\samples\d ). > > Albin > |
September 21, 2003 Re: DIDE .98 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Charles Sanders | I have DIDE 0.98, DIG that comes with DIDE and DMD 0.73.
Albin
Charles Sanders wrote:
> Thats odd, I compiled and got the same undefined errors with both DMD and
> DIG. What version of DIGC, DIDE, and dmd ?
>
> C
> "Albin Pucnik" <albin.pucnik@guest.arnes.si> wrote in message
> news:bkk865$54t$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>
>>Charles Sanders wrote:
>>
>>>Youll need at least DIGC, which is a great tool you should use it on the
>>>command line too.
>>>
>>>Charles
>>
>>When compiling a non-DIG windows program in DIDE I get complaints
>>in the form of Error 42: Symbol Undefined, compiling the same
>>program with DMD works fine.
>>( I compiled the program winsamp.d from c:\dmd\samples\d ).
>>
>>Albin
>>
>
>
>
|
September 21, 2003 Re: DIDE .98 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Albin Pucnik | Weird, try to recomplie DIGC (run C:/dig/go.bat ) with .73, dide ships with .72 I believe. Thanks, C "Albin Pucnik" <albin.pucnik@guest.arnes.si> wrote in message news:bkkuu8$13oi$1@digitaldaemon.com... > I have DIDE 0.98, DIG that comes with DIDE and DMD 0.73. > > Albin > > Charles Sanders wrote: > > Thats odd, I compiled and got the same undefined errors with both DMD and > > DIG. What version of DIGC, DIDE, and dmd ? > > > > C > > "Albin Pucnik" <albin.pucnik@guest.arnes.si> wrote in message > > news:bkk865$54t$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > >>Charles Sanders wrote: > >> > >>>Youll need at least DIGC, which is a great tool you should use it on the > >>>command line too. > >>> > >>>Charles > >> > >>When compiling a non-DIG windows program in DIDE I get complaints > >>in the form of Error 42: Symbol Undefined, compiling the same > >>program with DMD works fine. > >>( I compiled the program winsamp.d from c:\dmd\samples\d ). > >> > >>Albin > >> > > > > > > > |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation