My code compiled fine until I used the -inline switch and I got this:

foo.d(581): function bar cannot access frame of function __anonymous

I realized it was trying to inline a function that contained a foreach statement. I commented the foreach statements and it compiled ok. I noticed this error awhile ago with constructors but I think it was fixed already.

I also noticed something odd happening with nested foreach statements, I
tried to return in the inner one and it complained about the return type:
cannot implicitly convert ListItem to int. The inner one was something like
this:
foreach(ListItem li; list) { }
and the function's return type was ListItem. There were no ints involved so
it must be from the apply function.

If you could reproduce each of these with a small test case, that would be most helpful. Thanks, -Walter

"Vathix" <vathix@dprogramming.com> wrote in message news:blvf4a$1lft$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> My code compiled fine until I used the -inline switch and I got this:
>
> foo.d(581): function bar cannot access frame of function __anonymous
>
> I realized it was trying to inline a function that contained a foreach statement. I commented the foreach statements and it compiled ok. I
noticed
> this error awhile ago with constructors but I think it was fixed already.
>
> I also noticed something odd happening with nested foreach statements, I tried to return in the inner one and it complained about the return type: cannot implicitly convert ListItem to int. The inner one was something
like
> this:
> foreach(ListItem li; list) { }
> and the function's return type was ListItem. There were no ints involved
so
> it must be from the apply function.
>
>
>