AppName: dmd.exe AppVer: 0.0.0.0 ModName: dmd.exe
ModVer: 0.0.0.0 Offset: 00021126

In an attempt to trace, or avoid, the runtime stack overflow I've commented out a large section of code in the test app with /+ +/. This code contains several version{} sections.

It appears that the problem is that I'd commented out the entire contents of a foreach body. If I put "anything" back in it, the ICE goes away, even

foreach(Entry entry; search)
{
  int i; // ICE goes away!
}

"Matthew Wilson" <matthew@stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bm811h$2n3n$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> AppName: dmd.exe AppVer: 0.0.0.0 ModName: dmd.exe
> ModVer: 0.0.0.0 Offset: 00021126
>
> In an attempt to trace, or avoid, the runtime stack overflow I've
commented
> out a large section of code in the test app with /+ +/. This code contains several version{} sections.
>
> It appears that the problem is that I'd commented out the entire contents
of
> a foreach body. If I put "anything" back in it, the ICE goes away, even
>
> foreach(Entry entry; search)
> {
>   int i; // ICE goes away!
> }

I need a reproducible sample, please!

I can't do it. It only happens in a non-trivial setting.

"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:bm9red$2468$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>
> "Matthew Wilson" <matthew@stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bm811h$2n3n$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > AppName: dmd.exe AppVer: 0.0.0.0 ModName: dmd.exe
> > ModVer: 0.0.0.0 Offset: 00021126
> >
> > In an attempt to trace, or avoid, the runtime stack overflow I've
> commented
> > out a large section of code in the test app with /+ +/. This code
contains
> > several version{} sections.
> >
> > It appears that the problem is that I'd commented out the entire
contents
> of
> > a foreach body. If I put "anything" back in it, the ICE goes away, even
> >
> > foreach(Entry entry; search)
> > {
> >   int i; // ICE goes away!
> > }
>
> I need a reproducible sample, please!
>
>

Whats ICE ?


"Matthew Wilson" <matthew@stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bm9sbk$25bs$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> I can't do it. It only happens in a non-trivial setting.
>
> "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:bm9red$2468$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> >
> > "Matthew Wilson" <matthew@stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bm811h$2n3n$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > > AppName: dmd.exe AppVer: 0.0.0.0 ModName: dmd.exe
> > > ModVer: 0.0.0.0 Offset: 00021126
> > >
> > > In an attempt to trace, or avoid, the runtime stack overflow I've
> > commented
> > > out a large section of code in the test app with /+ +/. This code
> contains
> > > several version{} sections.
> > >
> > > It appears that the problem is that I'd commented out the entire
> contents
> > of
> > > a foreach body. If I put "anything" back in it, the ICE goes away,
even
> > >
> > > foreach(Entry entry; search)
> > > {
> > >   int i; // ICE goes away!
> > > }
> >
> > I need a reproducible sample, please!
> >
> >
>
>

Internal Compiler Error

"Charles Sanders" <sanders-consulting@comcast.net> wrote in message news:bm9u5i$27ul$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Whats ICE ?
>
>
> "Matthew Wilson" <matthew@stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bm9sbk$25bs$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > I can't do it. It only happens in a non-trivial setting.
> >
> > "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:bm9red$2468$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > >
> > > "Matthew Wilson" <matthew@stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bm811h$2n3n$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > > > AppName: dmd.exe AppVer: 0.0.0.0 ModName: dmd.exe
> > > > ModVer: 0.0.0.0 Offset: 00021126
> > > >
> > > > In an attempt to trace, or avoid, the runtime stack overflow I've
> > > commented
> > > > out a large section of code in the test app with /+ +/. This code
> > contains
> > > > several version{} sections.
> > > >
> > > > It appears that the problem is that I'd commented out the entire
> > contents
> > > of
> > > > a foreach body. If I put "anything" back in it, the ICE goes away,
> even
> > > >
> > > > foreach(Entry entry; search)
> > > > {
> > > >   int i; // ICE goes away!
> > > > }
> > >
> > > I need a reproducible sample, please!
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Can you get it into one file?

"Matthew Wilson" <matthew@stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bm9sbk$25bs$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> I can't do it. It only happens in a non-trivial setting.
>
> "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:bm9red$2468$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> >
> > "Matthew Wilson" <matthew@stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bm811h$2n3n$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > > AppName: dmd.exe AppVer: 0.0.0.0 ModName: dmd.exe
> > > ModVer: 0.0.0.0 Offset: 00021126
> > >
> > > In an attempt to trace, or avoid, the runtime stack overflow I've
> > commented
> > > out a large section of code in the test app with /+ +/. This code
> contains
> > > several version{} sections.
> > >
> > > It appears that the problem is that I'd commented out the entire
> contents
> > of
> > > a foreach body. If I put "anything" back in it, the ICE goes away,
even
> > >
> > > foreach(Entry entry; search)
> > > {
> > >   int i; // ICE goes away!
> > > }
> >
> > I need a reproducible sample, please!
> >
> >
>
>