Haven't even tried it yet, was just looking at the docs first time the past hour...  Seems like a dream come true...

Re.: No multiple inheritance...

I wouldn't mind 'no multiple *concrete* inheritance'.
I wouldn't mind 'no name conflict resolution in multiple inheritance'.
I wouldn't mind, even, no concrete inheritance at all...
But *abstract* multiple inheritance would be nice, I'd think...
Comments?

Question 2:
Anybody working on a "DSTL" yet?

dan

dan wrote:
> Re.: No multiple inheritance...
> 
> I wouldn't mind 'no multiple *concrete* inheritance'.
> I wouldn't mind 'no name conflict resolution in multiple inheritance'.
> I wouldn't mind, even, no concrete inheritance at all...
> But *abstract* multiple inheritance would be nice, I'd think...
> Comments?

Depends on what you mean by abstract in this case.  If you mean inheriting from an object containing only field declerations (without initializers) and method prototypes, then we have it with Interfaces.