December 12, 2003 Re: OT: Re: switch voting | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ilya Minkov | Ilya Minkov wrote:
> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>
>> No reason to be angry. 233 MHz is still 150 times faster than 1.7MHz...
>
>
> Whoops! An oversight!!! LOLROTFL :D
>
> My first computer was a speccy at 4 MHz. :) 1.7 MHz looks like a pocket calculator frequency.
>
> sorry. :)
Hey! THat's still faster than my C64!
|
December 12, 2003 Re: OT: Re: switch voting | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Berin Loritsch | Berin Loritsch wrote: > Hey! THat's still faster than my C64! Though it only ran at 1 MHz, the CPU was quite a bit more efficient. Take your C64 or VICE and goto http://www.smash-designs.de/c64demo.html I happen to know their musician. You will see realtime raytracing (in "Decade") and all kinds of *really* impossible stuff!!!!!!! BTW, "Second Reality" is a C64 port of a legendary PC demo from 1992 which originally requiered a 486 with 40 MHz!!!!!! Check it out and you will never want to use your PC again, full of overbloated and inefficient software, and multi-gigabyte software development kits! Unless you want to view the PC demos from Smash Designs... |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation