December 12, 2003
Ilya Minkov wrote:

> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
> 
>> No reason to be angry. 233 MHz is still 150 times faster than 1.7MHz...
> 
> 
> Whoops! An oversight!!! LOLROTFL :D
> 
> My first computer was a speccy at 4 MHz. :) 1.7 MHz looks like a pocket calculator frequency.
> 
> sorry. :)

Hey!  THat's still faster than my C64!

December 12, 2003
Berin Loritsch wrote:
> Hey!  THat's still faster than my C64!

Though it only ran at 1 MHz, the CPU was quite a bit more efficient.

Take your C64 or VICE and goto http://www.smash-designs.de/c64demo.html
I happen to know their musician.

You will see realtime raytracing (in "Decade") and all kinds of *really* impossible stuff!!!!!!!

BTW, "Second Reality" is a C64 port of a legendary PC demo from 1992 which originally requiered a 486 with 40 MHz!!!!!!

Check it out and you will never want to use your PC again, full of overbloated and inefficient software, and multi-gigabyte software development kits! Unless you want to view the PC demos from Smash Designs...

December 13, 2003
|    D     |    M     |     D     | CS

—————————————————————————
Carlos Santander
|    D     |    M     |     D     | CS

————————————————————————— Carlos Santander


1 2 3 4
Next ›   Last »