December 15, 2003 For each syntax sugar | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
char [] a;
//Parhaps instead of
foreach (int i, char c; a) {}
//This could be used, when we want the standard foreach behavior, //where the first is the index and the second is the value.
foreach (i, c; a) {}
-Anderson
| ||||
December 15, 2003 Re: For each syntax sugar | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to J Anderson | hm.. you're hitting a serious point here, namely the point of implicit automagic type deduction (or so:D)... wich is a very interesting way to implement templates, too...
template max(a,b) { if(a > b) return a; return b; }
similar to C macros actually:D
not sure where that all goes, but its an interesting direction to think about..
In article <brjoa1$1re5$1@digitaldaemon.com>, J Anderson says...
>
>char [] a;
>//Parhaps instead of
>foreach (int i, char c; a) {}
>
>//This could be used, when we want the standard foreach behavior, //where the first is the index and the second is the value. foreach (i, c; a) {}
>
>-Anderson
>
| |||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation
Permalink
Reply