Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 20, 2013 [Issue 10424] New: array operations accept rvalues on the lhs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10424 Summary: array operations accept rvalues on the lhs Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: nilsbossung@googlemail.com --- Comment #0 from Nils <nilsbossung@googlemail.com> 2013-06-20 08:16:49 PDT --- int f(); int[] g(); void main() { //f() = 42; // as expected: Error: f() is not an lvalue //g() = [42]; // as expected: Error: g() is not an lvalue g()[] = [42]; // compiles, but shouldn't } -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
June 20, 2013 [Issue 10424] array operations accept rvalues on the lhs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Nils | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10424 Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> 2013-06-20 08:33:18 PDT --- In Expression *AssignExp::semantic(Scope *sc) I could add this check: diff --git a/src/expression.c b/src/expression.c index becbcbb..19e008d 100644 --- a/src/expression.c +++ b/src/expression.c @@ -11153,8 +11153,10 @@ Ltupleassign: else if (e1->op == TOKslice) { Type *tn = e1->type->nextOf(); - if (op == TOKassign && e1->checkModifiable(sc) == 1 && !tn->isMutable()) - { error("slice %s is not mutable", e1->toChars()); + if (op == TOKassign && e1->checkModifiable(sc) == 1 && + (!tn->isMutable() || !((SliceExp *)e1)->e1->isLvalue())) + { + error("slice %s is not mutable", e1->toChars()); return new ErrorExp(); } } But I don't think that's totally correct. Kenji? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
June 21, 2013 [Issue 10424] array operations accept rvalues on the lhs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Nils | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10424 Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg@gmail.com> 2013-06-20 18:39:14 PDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > int f(); > int[] g(); > void main() > { > //f() = 42; // as expected: Error: f() is not an lvalue > //g() = [42]; // as expected: Error: g() is not an lvalue > g()[] = [42]; // compiles, but shouldn't > } The line is correct D code. g() returns an rvalue int[] array, but the assignment is element-wise, and elements of array are always lvalue. Then, there's no meaningless rvalue modification. void main() { int[] a = [1]; int[] arr = a; int[] g() { return arr; } g()[] = [42]; // element-wise assignment // essentially same as: // int[] x = [42]; arr[] = x[]; assert(arr.ptr == a.ptr); assert(arr == [42]); } -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
June 21, 2013 [Issue 10424] array operations accept rvalues on the lhs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Nils | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10424 --- Comment #3 from Nils <nilsbossung@googlemail.com> 2013-06-21 08:58:48 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > The line is correct D code. g() returns an rvalue int[] array, but the assignment is element-wise, and elements of array are always lvalue. Then, there's no meaningless rvalue modification. You're right. I over-simplified the test-case. The actual problem involved fixed-sized arrays: struct P { int[2] _data; int[2] data() {return _data;} } void main() { P p; p.data[] = [42, 42]; /* would be neat if this threw a "not an lvalue" error */ p.data[0] = 42; /* ditto */ } So the issue is that the elements of rvalue fixed-sized arrays are treated as lvalues. Should I file a new bug for that? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation