Thread overview | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
November 13, 2010 [Issue 5209] New: posix/sys/select.d: FD_ISSET function should return bool | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5209 Summary: posix/sys/select.d: FD_ISSET function should return bool Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: druntime AssignedTo: sean@invisibleduck.org ReportedBy: ibuclaw@ubuntu.com --- Comment #0 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@ubuntu.com> 2010-11-13 06:17:34 PST --- This is how FD_ISSET is defined on Linux #define __FD_ISSET(d, set) \ ((__FDS_BITS (set)[__FDELT (d)] & __FDMASK (d)) != 0) So druntime should do the same (patch supplied). This is also a blocker for 64bit, where you would get an implicit cast from long to int message. Regards -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
November 13, 2010 [Issue 5209] posix/sys/select.d: FD_ISSET function should return bool | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Iain Buclaw | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5209 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@ubuntu.com> 2010-11-13 06:18:41 PST --- Created an attachment (id=809) patch for 5209 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
December 21, 2010 [Issue 5209] posix/sys/select.d: FD_ISSET function should return bool | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Iain Buclaw | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5209 Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@ubuntu.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|major |critical --- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@ubuntu.com> 2010-12-21 13:33:04 PST --- Bumping priority: It appears *ONE* of the functions has been changed to a boolean. But what's utterly worse is that: extern (D) bool FD_ISSET( int fd, fd_set* fdset ) { return (fdset.fds_bits[__FDELT( fd )] & __FDMASK( fd )) == 0; } should be "!= 0" Regards -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
December 21, 2010 [Issue 5209] posix/sys/select.d: FD_ISSET function should return bool | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Iain Buclaw | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5209 Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |braddr@puremagic.com --- Comment #3 from Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> 2010-12-21 13:43:47 PST --- Would you do me a favor and write up a block of unit tests for those functions? I'll apply both together. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
December 22, 2010 [Issue 5209] posix/sys/select.d: FD_ISSET function should return bool | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Iain Buclaw | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5209 --- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@ubuntu.com> 2010-12-21 16:33:12 PST --- Created an attachment (id=852) unittest for sys.select Well the most obvious thing it affects is std.socket; import std.socket; unittest { SocketSet sset = new SocketSet(24); // All socket descriptors should not be set before using them. for (socket_t i = 0; i < sset.max; i++) { assert(! sset.isSet(i)); } } Is the attached file OK? :~) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
December 22, 2010 [Issue 5209] posix/sys/select.d: FD_ISSET function should return bool | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Iain Buclaw | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5209 Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED AssignedTo|sean@invisibleduck.org |braddr@puremagic.com --- Comment #5 from Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> 2010-12-21 16:54:21 PST --- Checked in both the fix and the unittests in r453 and r454. Thanks for the patches. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation