http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7528

           Summary: The core.atomic module does not have implementations
                    when compiling with -D.
           Product: D
           Version: D2
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: druntime
        AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: opantm+spam@gmail.com


--- Comment #0 from Kapps <opantm+spam@gmail.com> 2012-02-16 17:25:43 PST ---
Most methods in core.atomic are versioned out with a stub method replacing them when generating documentation. If you attempt to use something like atomicOp for example, it will still compile but do nothing and always return T.init (leading to quite a bit of confusion). If you try to use cas, you get a symbol undefined, as the actual implementation is excluded when version(D_Doc) is set.

Test case:

module Test;
import std.stdio;
import core.atomic;

void main() {
    int* a = new int();
    *a = 2;
    int* b = new int();
    *b = 1;
    bool Result = cas(cast(shared)&a, cast(shared)a, cast(shared)b);
    writeln(Result, ": ", *a, ", ", *b);
}

Compile with 'dmd test.d' and it runs and prints "true: 1, 1". Compile with 'dmd test.d -D' and it will fail to link with "Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D4core6atomic20__T3casTPOiTPOiTPOiZ3casFPOPiOxPiOPiZb".

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7528


Kapps <opantm+spam@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


--- Comment #1 from Kapps <opantm+spam@gmail.com> 2012-02-23 01:07:08 PST ---
Looks like this is a duplicate of 5930, which didn't appear in my search for atomic.

Worth keeping in mind that this does cause incorrect results to be generated without warning when using atomic operations.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 5930 ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------