Thread overview | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
July 10, 2012 [Issue 8374] New: One missed array literal interpretation as int[2] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8374 Summary: One missed array literal interpretation as int[2] Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: bearophile_hugs@eml.cc --- Comment #0 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2012-07-10 15:18:42 PDT --- I am not sure, but I think this code is correct: struct Foo { int[2] bar; } const(int[2]) spam() { const Foo* x; return true ? x.bar : [10, 20]; } void main() {} But DMD 2.060alpha gives: test.d(6): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (cast(const(int)[])(*x).bar) of type const(int)[] to const(int[2u]) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
July 10, 2012 [Issue 8374] One missed array literal interpretation as int[2] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8374 Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |bugzilla@digitalmars.com Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> 2012-07-10 16:36:56 PDT --- The type of [1,2] is int[], not int[2]. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
July 10, 2012 [Issue 8374] One missed array literal interpretation as int[2] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8374 timon.gehr@gmx.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |timon.gehr@gmx.ch Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #2 from timon.gehr@gmx.ch 2012-07-10 16:56:28 PDT --- The [1,2] / [10,20] literal implicitly converts to int[2]. It is similar to the following: struct Foo{ short bar; } short spam() { const Foo* x; return true ? x.bar : 1; } -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
July 11, 2012 [Issue 8374] One missed array literal interpretation as int[2] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8374 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2012-07-10 17:49:56 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > The type of > > [1,2] > > is int[], not int[2]. Usually in my bug reports I add some cases where the code works, to avoid troubles like this one. This works: struct Foo { int[2] bar; } int[2] spam() { Foo* x; return true ? x.bar : [10, 20]; } void main() {} This too works: struct Foo { int[2] bar; } const(int[2]) spam() { const Foo* x; const(int[2]) r = true ? x.bar : [10, 20]; return r; } void main() {} -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
January 16, 2013 [Issue 8374] One missed array literal interpretation as int[2] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile_hugs@eml.cc | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8374 yebblies <yebblies@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yebblies@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from yebblies <yebblies@gmail.com> 2013-01-17 02:22:44 EST --- Is this the same as issue 8277? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation