ok i didnt like any of the List classes that i found, so i made my own. what do you think:

List!(int) myList = new List!(int);

list.append(9);
list.prepend(4);

for(List!(int).Node node = myList.first; node; node = node.next)
{
printf("%u", node());//overloaded opCall
printf("%u", node.t);//not quite as elegant, but required sometimes
}

what do you guys think?

'overload' foreach.. that'll be most fun:D

and opRange should be doable, too, rather simple.. (even for placing into
foreach..)

"imr1984" <imr1984_member@pathlink.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:c07ic9$1dje$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> ok i didnt like any of the List classes that i found, so i made my own.
what do
> you think:
>
> List!(int) myList = new List!(int);
>
> list.append(9);
> list.prepend(4);
>
> for(List!(int).Node node = myList.first; node; node = node.next)
> {
> printf("%u", node());//overloaded opCall
> printf("%u", node.t);//not quite as elegant, but required sometimes
> }
>
> what do you guys think?
>
>

is that possible? how do i do that?

In article <c07p50$1p0t$1@digitaldaemon.com>, davepermen says...
>
>'overload' foreach.. that'll be most fun:D
>
>and opRange should be doable, too, rather simple.. (even for placing into
>foreach..)
>
>"imr1984" <imr1984_member@pathlink.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:c07ic9$1dje$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>> ok i didnt like any of the List classes that i found, so i made my own.
>what do
>> you think:
>>
>> List!(int) myList = new List!(int);
>>
>> list.append(9);
>> list.prepend(4);
>>
>> for(List!(int).Node node = myList.first; node; node = node.next)
>> {
>> printf("%u", node());//overloaded opCall
>> printf("%u", node.t);//not quite as elegant, but required sometimes
>> }
>>
>> what do you guys think?
>>
>>
>
>

its all in the manuals..

"imr1984" <imr1984_member@pathlink.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:c085vu$2dtc$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> is that possible? how do i do that?
>
> In article <c07p50$1p0t$1@digitaldaemon.com>, davepermen says...
> >
> >'overload' foreach.. that'll be most fun:D
> >
> >and opRange should be doable, too, rather simple.. (even for placing into
> >foreach..)
> >
> >"imr1984" <imr1984_member@pathlink.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:c07ic9$1dje$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> >> ok i didnt like any of the List classes that i found, so i made my own.
> >what do
> >> you think:
> >>
> >> List!(int) myList = new List!(int);
> >>
> >> list.append(9);
> >> list.prepend(4);
> >>
> >> for(List!(int).Node node = myList.first; node; node = node.next)
> >> {
> >> printf("%u", node());//overloaded opCall
> >> printf("%u", node.t);//not quite as elegant, but required sometimes
> >> }
> >>
> >> what do you guys think?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

imr1984 wrote:

> ok i didnt like any of the List classes that i found, so i made my own. what do
> you think:
> 
> List!(int) myList = new List!(int);
> 
> list.append(9);
> list.prepend(4);
> 
> for(List!(int).Node node = myList.first; node; node = node.next)
> {
> printf("%u", node());//overloaded opCall
> printf("%u", node.t);//not quite as elegant, but required sometimes
> }
> 
> what do you guys think?
> 
> 
Nice! I still think List should be an interface a la Java though, with linked and array based implementations. Implementing foreach and indexing would be nice.
Sam