Thread overview |
---|
February 16, 2004 phobos licence? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
lisence.txt in dmd binary distribution says: "The Software is copyrighted and comes with a single user license, and may not be redistributed. If you wish to obtain a redistribution license, please contact Digital Mars." In my view. only src/dmd is under GPL/Artistic License, phobos is not. (of cource, src/etc/c/* ported library have its licence) Is it right? if so, we cannot distribute modified version of phobos code, as long as no reply from digital mars .. and Walter is busy. As a result: - Many ppl say [bug]... some bug is in phobos rather than compiler. we can fix personaly, but cannot release. - GCC frontend work in progress. Does it means that someone will rewrite phobos compatible library under GPL compatible licence from scratch to run? |
February 16, 2004 Re: phobos licence? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to BERO | Unless the individual file says otherwise, it's under the dual GPL/Artistic license. "BERO" <berobero@users.sourceforge.net> wrote in message news:c0qpr3$2m3l$1@digitaldaemon.com... > lisence.txt in dmd binary distribution says: > > "The Software is copyrighted and comes with a single user license, > and may not be redistributed. If you wish to obtain a redistribution > license, > please contact Digital Mars." > > In my view. only src/dmd is under GPL/Artistic License, > phobos is not. (of cource, src/etc/c/* ported library have its licence) > Is it right? > if so, we cannot distribute modified version of phobos code, > as long as no reply from digital mars .. and Walter is busy. > > As a result: > - Many ppl say [bug]... > > some bug is in phobos rather than compiler. > we can fix personaly, but cannot release. > > > - GCC frontend work in progress. > > Does it means that someone will rewrite phobos compatible library under GPL > compatible licence from scratch to run? > |
February 17, 2004 Re: phobos licence? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:c0r1f3$19a$2@digitaldaemon.com... > Unless the individual file says otherwise, it's under the dual GPL/Artistic > license. > I'm glad to get your reply. I think you should explain clearly especially this page. although written to othere place, wasn't I only found? http://www.digitalmars.com/d/dcompiler.html \dmd\src\phobos\ D runtime library source \dmd\src\dmd\ D compiler front end source under dual (GPL and Artistic) license \dmd\html\d\ Documentation \dmd\samples\d\ Sample D programs |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation