Nam wrote:

> I've tested your framework and see it run ok . Please I need an alpha
> ;) , not a pre-alpha version. When i was testing the helloworld
> example , it throws an exception when I press the update button on
> dialog1.

Yes, it throws an exception if neither radiobutton is selected.  I really should initialise them.

> But everything runs fine , I'm looking to your source in
> order get more details. ;) btw,  I hope I will see a more details
> documentation.
<snip>

I'm working on it, but most weekdays the only time I get on my PC is an hour or two in the evening.  Hopefully I'll have time at the weekend, and have it mostly if not all done by this time next week.

> A small suggestion : Please use opAddAssign to handlers if you can, cause the handler=&function remind me to an assembly world and the +=
> will generate more effect to C# user and make code .. abit clearly
> (though I'm a javaman and i expect the object.addHandler than
> operator += ) ;)

The handler array relies on the identification of two things: the message itself being handled and the name of the handler method.  How do you reckon the += syntax would work?

Stewart.

-- 
My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox, aside from its being the
unfortunate victim of intensive mail-bombing at the moment.  Please keep
replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.