change the score when you reply:

Aye: 1
Nay: 0

In article <c3a1bu$2j8v$1@digitaldaemon.com>, imr1984 says...
>
>change the score when you reply:
>
>Aye: 1
>Nay: 0
>
>

Aye: 1
Nay: 1

-Jon

On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Jon <Jon_member@pathlink.com> wrote:

synchronized {

 Aye: 1
 Nay: 2

}



> In article <c3a1bu$2j8v$1@digitaldaemon.com>, imr1984 says...
>>
>> change the score when you reply:
>>
>> Aye: 1
>> Nay: 0
>>
>>
>
> Aye: 1
> Nay: 1
>
> -Jon



-- 
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

Aye: 1
Nay: 668

(i'm playing foreign games by my own rules and vote multiple times)

If they are changed, we will severely compromise the performance scalability of D to different systems! They will prove *very* useful as they are defined in a few years.

-eye


C schrieb:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Jon <Jon_member@pathlink.com> wrote:
> 
> synchronized {
> 
>  Aye: 1
>  Nay: 2
> 
> }

imr1984 wrote:

> change the score when you reply:
> 
> Aye: 1
> Nay: 0
> 
> 

in/out/inout aid the programmer and possibly allow optimizations. But sometimes you only need an input or output reference depending on runtime values, that's there ref would come in handy. I think it would be nice to add it.


-- 
Christopher E. Miller

On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:58:03 -0800, C <dont@respond.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Jon <Jon_member@pathlink.com> wrote:
>
> synchronized {
>
>   Aye: 1
>   Nay: 2
>
> }
>
>
>

Aye: 1
Nay: 3

I have to say nay, because I don't understand the point of the proposal. Please explain.

synchronized
{
 Aye: 1
 Nay: 4
}

"Andrew Edwards" <remove_ridimz@remove_yahoo.com> wrote in message news:opr40tpklzs6zaqn@news.digitalmars.com...
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:58:03 -0800, C <dont@respond.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Jon <Jon_member@pathlink.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > synchronized {
> >
> >   Aye: 1
> >   Nay: 2
> >
> > }
> >
> >
> >
>
> Aye: 1
> Nay: 3

Vathix schrieb:

> in/out/inout aid the programmer and possibly allow optimizations. But sometimes you only need an input or output reference depending on runtime values, that's there ref would come in handy. I think it would be nice to add it.

I simply don't get it what for??? We have inout. We have pointer. What else would be ref but an alias to inout????

-eye

No.

synchronized
{
  Aye: 1
  Nay: 5
}

I don't know what it is, but I doubt I'd like it.

-- 
Justin
http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/

On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:19:58 +0000 (UTC) (18/Mar/04 04:19:58 AM)
, imr1984 <imr1984_member@pathlink.com> wrote:

> change the score when you reply:
>
> Aye: 1
> Nay: 0
>
>

My vote: No.

Reasons:
(a) 'in', 'out', and 'inout' all mean different things and a single 'ref' keyword cannot replace all their meanings.
(b) By using explicit keywords, the intentions of the coder are more obvious to the reader.
(c) Using keywords for each case makes the code more 'grepable'.

-- 
Derek