In article <c3lrln$13i0$1@digitaldaemon.com>, John Reimer says...
>
><SNIP>
> 
>> No worries. I've been attacked from the top to the bottom in the last year, so it's cool with me. I think you could probably work on your presentation though, as your post does have pretty unfortunate wording. Were I a bit precious, I might react to the sentiments presented (which I don't imagine are what you meant) rather than the one good point you made, which is that the range thing was probably unnecessary, which I largely agree with.
>> 
>> :)
>
>I actually have got accustomed to Ant's style ;-).
[...]
> For the most part, I think you never have to take offense from Ant.
> His unfortunate wording is more of a side affect of ESL than anything else.

Of course you're right.
thank you.

I just realize that if I don't post this confirmation it might look like I don't agree.

Ant

In article <c3ppc5$1lu7$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Ant says...
>
>In article <c3lrln$13i0$1@digitaldaemon.com>, John Reimer says...
>>
>><SNIP>
>> 
>>> No worries. I've been attacked from the top to the bottom in the last year, so it's cool with me. I think you could probably work on your presentation though, as your post does have pretty unfortunate wording. Were I a bit precious, I might react to the sentiments presented (which I don't imagine are what you meant) rather than the one good point you made, which is that the range thing was probably unnecessary, which I largely agree with.
>>> 
>>> :)
>>
>>I actually have got accustomed to Ant's style ;-).
>[...]
>> For the most part, I think you never have to take offense from Ant.
>> His unfortunate wording is more of a side affect of ESL than anything else.
>
>Of course you're right.
>thank you.
>
>I just realize that if I don't post this confirmation it might look like I don't agree.
>
>Ant
>
>

Maybe it's a cultural thing: until now, I can't find his words offensive by any means.

-------------------
Carlos Santander B.