On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:51:41 -0800, C wrote:

>> there is also an efford to port SWT http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=1
>>
>> (I'm not iterest in other toolkits that are windows centric)
>>
> 
> Very cool site , does someone want to post its release to the NG (new topic) ?

oops, wasn't this suppose to be public yet? :}

Ant

On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:36:23 -0500, Ant <duitoolkit@yahoo.ca> wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:51:41 -0800, C wrote:
>
>>> there is also an efford to port SWT
>>> http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=1
>>>
>>> (I'm not iterest in other toolkits that are windows centric)
>>>
>>
>> Very cool site , does someone want to post its release to the NG (new
>> topic) ?
>
> oops, wasn't this suppose to be public yet? :}

That will cause any problems (just generate visitors)...its pretty good so far.

> Ant
>
>



-- 
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:02:43 -0500, Andrew Edwards <remove_ridimz@remove_yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:36:23 -0500, Ant <duitoolkit@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:51:41 -0800, C wrote:
>>
>>>> there is also an efford to port SWT
>>>> http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=1
>>>>
>>>> (I'm not iterest in other toolkits that are windows centric)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Very cool site , does someone want to post its release to the NG (new
>>> topic) ?
>>
>> oops, wasn't this suppose to be public yet? :}
>
> That will cause any problems (just generate visitors)...its pretty good so far.

I can see I'm having a few problems of my own.

read the above comment as:

 "That should not cause any porblems"

>   "That should not cause any porblems"
lol

On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:09:01 -0500, Andrew Edwards <remove_ridimz@remove_yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:02:43 -0500, Andrew Edwards <remove_ridimz@remove_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:36:23 -0500, Ant <duitoolkit@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:51:41 -0800, C wrote:
>>>
>>>>> there is also an efford to port SWT
>>>>> http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=1
>>>>>
>>>>> (I'm not iterest in other toolkits that are windows centric)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Very cool site , does someone want to post its release to the NG (new
>>>> topic) ?
>>>
>>> oops, wasn't this suppose to be public yet? :}
>>
>> That will cause any problems (just generate visitors)...its pretty good so far.
>
> I can see I'm having a few problems of my own.
>
> read the above comment as:
>
>   "That should not cause any porblems"



-- 
D Newsgroup.

> Brad, John,
> Seems that leds and DUI suck up all the time I had to DWT,
> sorry about that:( that's the nature of volunteer
> development: I do what I feel like...
> I'm still iterested in making leds understand java,
> that might help because java to D conversion is the
> first step there.

Understandable... We'll be getting more into to it soon, I'm sure.  I'm too busy right now to put much effort into.  By April things should change.  Brad seems pretty busy too.  I'm still interested in the project, though.  I'm sure we'll be able to get your help at some point.

Later,

John

> 
> 
> oops, wasn't this suppose to be public yet? :}
> 
> Ant
> 
> 

You blabbed! LOL! I think Brad was waiting for the appropriate time. The site isn't ready, but it's getting there.

:-)

Raiko wrote:

> Topic :).
> 
> Maybe call it DFC :P

I know little of MFC, but gather that it's similar to OWL.  Have you checked out my project SDWF?
http://smjg.port5.com/pr/d/sdwf/

Stewart.

-- 
My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox, aside from its being the unfortunate victim of intensive mail-bombing at the moment.  Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.

I didn't know about yours, but it looks good.

Also, Windows API help files come in the Platform SDK, but it's a pretty hefty download for dialup users.



Stewart Gordon wrote:
> Raiko wrote:
> 
>> Topic :).
>>
>> Maybe call it DFC :P
> 
> 
> I know little of MFC, but gather that it's similar to OWL.  Have you checked out my project SDWF?
> http://smjg.port5.com/pr/d/sdwf/
> 
> Stewart.
> 

They also come on Walter DMC++ IDE  cd.

Phill.


"Raiko" <phantom2023@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c3n928$d92$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> I didn't know about yours, but it looks good.
>
> Also, Windows API help files come in the Platform SDK, but it's a pretty hefty download for dialup users.
>
>
>
> Stewart Gordon wrote:
> > Raiko wrote:
> >
> >> Topic :).
> >>
> >> Maybe call it DFC :P
> >
> >
> > I know little of MFC, but gather that it's similar to OWL.  Have you
> > checked out my project SDWF?
> > http://smjg.port5.com/pr/d/sdwf/
> >
> > Stewart.
> >

satelliittipupu wrote:
>>"Mathew" wrote
>>Seriously, though, there are efforts to make windowing platforms.
> 
> 
> Hopefully those efforts will get webpages soon. I really might be interested in
> this D thing. And I also have to believe you on the multiple inheritance thing
> and just stop using it.
> 
> 
>>"Raiko" <phantom2023@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>>>Maybe call it DFC :P
> 
> 
> Please no :). Whatever the name will be it would be quite cool to do the
> following thigs:
> 
> -be almost API compatible with Gtkmm (a C++ widget toolkit). Ofcourse the API
> should be changed in the parts where D syntax differs from C++. I think it still
> could be made mostly the same. If the APIs were nearly the same, that would make
> it easy to learn and port.
> -it could use OpenGL for all the graphics rendering. This would hopefully make
> it visually stunning much in the way that OS X is now. All kinds of great
> animation possibilities, transparency, and ofcourse hardware accelerated.
> -every file should be XML (where possible)
> -screen should be resolution independent, measures should be in centimetres.
> 

Would this enable vector based screen captures? That would be really cool for printed user manuals and reports.

Bastiaan.