"Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c598ie$u0r$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> - a decent I/O system (what are your thoughts on this Walter?)

Stewart; would you be interested in perusing the Dsc.io package?

- Kris

"School" <school@users.sf.net> wrote in message news:c58dmf$2p1f$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> I personally hate "%.*s" "%d" in the first arg of printing something out. Yet I am more comfortable with C++'s iostream or python's approach.

Ahh. Different topic School. The reference here is about the root Object having a reference to printf embedded within it.

Oh ... complete debug-symbols for classes, arrays, etc


"Ant" <Ant_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:c51n04$11q0$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> So what is missing so we can call it 1.0?
> (excluding obvious bugs)
>
> dmd:
> - interfaces
> - clean compiler messages
> - compiler don't give up on first error
> - array literal expressions
> ---------
> phobos:
> - at least the linux version has to catchup to windows!
> - severe bugs (like std.zip and std.date)
>
> obviously the OO guys can't live without
> the full implementation of the interfaces
> as Kris referred and Burton has noticed before.
>
> for now I can't remember anything else but
> my projects are filled with work arround solutions
> for old problems.
>
> Ant
>
>

On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:46:06 -0800, Kris wrote:

> Oh ... complete debug-symbols for classes, arrays, etc
> 
yes.

and debug support in linux.
and shared libs in linux!

Ant

All three of these would be bonus.

Ant wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:46:06 -0800, Kris wrote:
> 
> 
>>Oh ... complete debug-symbols for classes, arrays, etc
>>
> 
> yes.
> 
> and debug support in linux.
> and shared libs in linux!
> 
> Ant
> 

On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 12:47:00 -0500, Brad Anderson wrote:

> All three of these would be bonus.

I disagree. We need shared libs and debug before
it can be called 1.0!
(At the very least shared libs.)

I know that there is limited support for debug in linux.
(I never could make it work)

Ant

> 
> Ant wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:46:06 -0800, Kris wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>Oh ... complete debug-symbols for classes, arrays, etc
>>>
>> 
>> yes.
>> 
>> and debug support in linux.
>> and shared libs in linux!
>> 
>> Ant
>>

Ant,

I was agreeing with you.

BA

Ant wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 12:47:00 -0500, Brad Anderson wrote:
> 
> 
>>All three of these would be bonus.
> 
> 
> I disagree. We need shared libs and debug before
> it can be called 1.0!
> (At the very least shared libs.)
> 
> I know that there is limited support for debug in linux.
> (I never could make it work)
> 
> Ant
> 
> 
>>Ant wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:46:06 -0800, Kris wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Oh ... complete debug-symbols for classes, arrays, etc
>>>>
>>>
>>>yes.
>>>
>>>and debug support in linux.
>>>and shared libs in linux!
>>>
>>>Ant
>>>
> 
> 

Kris wrote:
> "Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:c598ie$u0r$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> 
>>- a decent I/O system (what are your thoughts on this Walter?)
> 
> Stewart; would you be interested in perusing the Dsc.io package?

If I had a clue where to find it, I'd take a look.

Stewart.

-- 
My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on on the 'group where everyone may benefit.

OT:

It's home is at dsource.org, but it's still going through a kind of "under the radar" testing phase. Dsc is actually a family of three layered packages: io, http-server, and servlet-style framework. I will probably try to get the io package checked-in to dsource.org today, while the other two will perhaps lie-low a while longer.

I'll email you a current zip file of all three, though I'll need your address to do so (perhaps you could ping me, via the address given?). I'd like to ask that you provide some feedback in return: good, bad, or ugly -- all of it is valuable.

- Kris


"Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c5brpe$1mjd$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Kris wrote:
> > "Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c598ie$u0r$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> >
> >>- a decent I/O system (what are your thoughts on this Walter?)
> >
> > Stewart; would you be interested in perusing the Dsc.io package?
>
> If I had a clue where to find it, I'd take a look.
>
> Stewart.
>
> --
> My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on on the 'group where everyone may benefit.

Kris wrote:
<snip>
> I'll email you a current zip file of all three, though I'll need your
> address to do so (perhaps you could ping me, via the address given?).
<snip top of upside-down reply>

I'm not sure how or where I'm meant to 'ping' you, nor what "address given" you're referring to.

Stewart.

-- 
My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on on the 'group where everyone may benefit.