Scott Egan wrote:
> Thanks,
> 
> after looking at Phills source, I noticed that the importeded module had a
> specific module statement, so I included on in mine.  That fixed the
> problem.
> 
> All files were compiling and the only thing I can thing of is that I named
> the file in uppercase. 

I'm glad to hear that.

-- 
Justin
http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/

"Phill" <phill@pacific.net.au> wrote in message news:c75bcl$1r05$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>
> "Scott Egan" <scotte@tpg.com.aux> wrote in message news:c75aun$1qhc$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > Thanks Phill.
> >
> > I got yours working even after I moved the 'globals g' definition to the glbl.d file.
> >
> > The only diference I noted was that you used the module statement at the
> top
> > of the glbl.d file.
> >
> > So I included it at the top of my file and the problem went away.
> >
> > Now....why?!!!  The reat of my files are imported OK without module statements.
> >
> > I thought modulename = filename (less .d) if not specified.  Any thoughts?
> >
> I dont know, I only put that there to look fancy lol
> it works either way with mine.
> I am not familiar with the way that the 'module'
> thing works, or whether you have to compile it
> in a similar way to Java's packages.
>
> Im waiting for Mathew's book. :o))

What book? What're you talking about. ;)

(As soon as I can get DTL done and out of the way, then maybe I can pay attention to some other, more potentially lucrative matters ... <G>)

> Or a tutorial to be written.
>
> I also use DIDE.
> See my other post, maybe it can help.

"Matthew" <matthew.hat@stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:c7hdi7$29ok$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>
> "Phill" <phill@pacific.net.au> wrote in message news:c75bcl$1r05$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> >
> > "Scott Egan" <scotte@tpg.com.aux> wrote in message news:c75aun$1qhc$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > > Thanks Phill.
> > >
> > > I got yours working even after I moved the 'globals g' definition to
the
> > > glbl.d file.
> > >
> > > The only diference I noted was that you used the module statement at
the
> > top
> > > of the glbl.d file.
> > >
> > > So I included it at the top of my file and the problem went away.
> > >
> > > Now....why?!!!  The reat of my files are imported OK without module statements.
> > >
> > > I thought modulename = filename (less .d) if not specified.  Any
thoughts?
> > >
> > I dont know, I only put that there to look fancy lol
> > it works either way with mine.
> > I am not familiar with the way that the 'module'
> > thing works, or whether you have to compile it
> > in a similar way to Java's packages.
> >
> > Im waiting for Mathew's book. :o))
>
> What book? What're you talking about. ;)
>
> (As soon as I can get DTL done and out of the way, then maybe I can pay
attention
> to some other, more potentially lucrative matters ... <G>)

Cant wait!

Ofcourse you would include a chapter(at least) on the DTL?

I have another OT question for you.
I have read articles by you a Walter in Dr Dobbs.
If one was to subscribe to a journal, which would you say would more likely
have the odd D article in it?
(Not including the D journal, because who knows when
that will surface.)

Thanks!
    Phill.

"Phill" <phill@pacific.net.au> wrote in message news:c7htjo$3057$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>
> "Matthew" <matthew.hat@stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:c7hdi7$29ok$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> >
> > "Phill" <phill@pacific.net.au> wrote in message news:c75bcl$1r05$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > >
> > > "Scott Egan" <scotte@tpg.com.aux> wrote in message news:c75aun$1qhc$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > > > Thanks Phill.
> > > >
> > > > I got yours working even after I moved the 'globals g' definition to
> the
> > > > glbl.d file.
> > > >
> > > > The only diference I noted was that you used the module statement at
> the
> > > top
> > > > of the glbl.d file.
> > > >
> > > > So I included it at the top of my file and the problem went away.
> > > >
> > > > Now....why?!!!  The reat of my files are imported OK without module statements.
> > > >
> > > > I thought modulename = filename (less .d) if not specified.  Any
> thoughts?
> > > >
> > > I dont know, I only put that there to look fancy lol
> > > it works either way with mine.
> > > I am not familiar with the way that the 'module'
> > > thing works, or whether you have to compile it
> > > in a similar way to Java's packages.
> > >
> > > Im waiting for Mathew's book. :o))
> >
> > What book? What're you talking about. ;)
> >
> > (As soon as I can get DTL done and out of the way, then maybe I can pay
> attention
> > to some other, more potentially lucrative matters ... <G>)
>
> Cant wait!
>
> Ofcourse you would include a chapter(at least) on the DTL?

That's for sure. (Of course, nothing's sorted on the D book yet.)

FYI, I'm actually thinking that of discussing other STL incarnations in other languages in my next book - "Extended STL". This'll fall naturally out of the Ranges concept work, since it spans both C++ and D, and I've also been chatting to some people about STL-like things in some other languages, but that's very early stuff.

> I have another OT question for you.
> I have read articles by you a Walter in Dr Dobbs.


To the best of my knowledge, so far we've had the following so far:

WB: "The D Programming Language", DDJ, Feb 2002
MW: "C# Performance: Comparison with C, C++, D and Java, Parts 1 & 2", WDN,
Special Online Supplement, Fall 2003
MW: "Identity and Equality: Syntax and Semantics", CUJ, October 2003
MW: "Positive Integration #3: Mapping recls to D and Java", CUJ, January 2004
WB + MW: "Collection Enumeration: Loops, Iterators and Nested Functions", DDJ,
March 2004
WB: "Nested Functions", CUJ, May 2004

(I've also got a couple of Tech Tips in with DDJ that pertain to D which may see the light of day sometime over the next 6-12 months.)

> If one was to subscribe to a journal, which would you say would more likely have the odd D article in it?

Despite the distribution shown above, it's far more likely that we'll be doing more for Dr Dobb's than CUJ. In fact, we're planning to make a few proposals very soon, so I would hope you'd get some D-value out of a year's subscription to DDJ if you made it now. ;)

But they're both great mags, so it depends on how much C++ vs everything-else you need.

> (Not including the D journal, because who knows when
> that will surface.)

Yeah, there are only so many hours in the day. Plus, for me, I've been living on thin air and shoe leather for the last 18 months - that's the romantic life of the penurious author <g> - so I favour submissions to paying journals when I can. Once I'm back in real work, I may well feel more than generously inclined towards TDJ, and aim my D submissions there.

"Matthew" <matthew.hat@stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:c7humu$31jj$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>
> "Phill" <phill@pacific.net.au> wrote in message news:c7htjo$3057$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> >
> > "Matthew" <matthew.hat@stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:c7hdi7$29ok$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > >
> > > "Phill" <phill@pacific.net.au> wrote in message news:c75bcl$1r05$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > > >
> > > > "Scott Egan" <scotte@tpg.com.aux> wrote in message news:c75aun$1qhc$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > > > > Thanks Phill.
> > > > >
> > > > > I got yours working even after I moved the 'globals g' definition
to
> > the
> > > > > glbl.d file.
> > > > >
> > > > > The only diference I noted was that you used the module statement
at
> > the
> > > > top
> > > > > of the glbl.d file.
> > > > >
> > > > > So I included it at the top of my file and the problem went away.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now....why?!!!  The reat of my files are imported OK without
module
> > > > > statements.
> > > > >
> > > > > I thought modulename = filename (less .d) if not specified.  Any
> > thoughts?
> > > > >
> > > > I dont know, I only put that there to look fancy lol
> > > > it works either way with mine.
> > > > I am not familiar with the way that the 'module'
> > > > thing works, or whether you have to compile it
> > > > in a similar way to Java's packages.
> > > >
> > > > Im waiting for Mathew's book. :o))
> > >
> > > What book? What're you talking about. ;)
> > >
> > > (As soon as I can get DTL done and out of the way, then maybe I can
pay
> > attention
> > > to some other, more potentially lucrative matters ... <G>)
> >
> > Cant wait!
> >
> > Ofcourse you would include a chapter(at least) on the DTL?
>
> That's for sure. (Of course, nothing's sorted on the D book yet.)
>
> FYI, I'm actually thinking that of discussing other STL incarnations in
other
> languages in my next book - "Extended STL". This'll fall naturally out of
the
> Ranges concept work, since it spans both C++ and D, and I've also been
chatting
> to some people about STL-like things in some other languages, but that's
very
> early stuff.
>
> > I have another OT question for you.
> > I have read articles by you a Walter in Dr Dobbs.
>
>
> To the best of my knowledge, so far we've had the following so far:
>
> WB: "The D Programming Language", DDJ, Feb 2002
> MW: "C# Performance: Comparison with C, C++, D and Java, Parts 1 & 2",
WDN,
> Special Online Supplement, Fall 2003
> MW: "Identity and Equality: Syntax and Semantics", CUJ, October 2003
> MW: "Positive Integration #3: Mapping recls to D and Java", CUJ, January
2004
> WB + MW: "Collection Enumeration: Loops, Iterators and Nested Functions",
DDJ,
> March 2004
> WB: "Nested Functions", CUJ, May 2004
>
> (I've also got a couple of Tech Tips in with DDJ that pertain to D which
may see
> the light of day sometime over the next 6-12 months.)
>
> > If one was to subscribe to a journal, which would you say would more
likely
> > have the odd D article in it?
>
> Despite the distribution shown above, it's far more likely that we'll be
doing
> more for Dr Dobb's than CUJ. In fact, we're planning to make a few
proposals very
> soon, so I would hope you'd get some D-value out of a year's subscription
to DDJ
> if you made it now. ;)
>
> But they're both great mags, so it depends on how much C++ vs
everything-else you
> need.
>
> > (Not including the D journal, because who knows when
> > that will surface.)
>
> Yeah, there are only so many hours in the day. Plus, for me, I've been
living on
> thin air and shoe leather for the last 18 months - that's the romantic
life of
> the penurious author <g> - so I favour submissions to paying journals when
I can.
> Once I'm back in real work, I may well feel more than generously inclined
towards
> TDJ, and aim my D submissions there.
>

Thanks Mathew!

DDJ it shall be then.

Phill.