Thread overview | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
May 21, 2004 window_visible_scope | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
What about window_visible_scope (analogous to window_enable_scope), any plans for that? |
May 22, 2004 Re: window_visible_scope | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Pablo Aguilar | Hmm. I thought I had that. Let me plough through all my old Synesis code. ;) "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c8m2g0$1h7g$1@digitaldaemon.com... > What about window_visible_scope (analogous to window_enable_scope), any > plans for that? > > |
May 26, 2004 Re: window_visible_scope | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Matthew Attachments: | Here it is! This is not part of beta 8, but will be in the released 1.7.1, which I think just might be tomorrow. hurrah! "Matthew" <matthew.hat@stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:c8mglm$25e1$2@digitaldaemon.com... > Hmm. I thought I had that. > > Let me plough through all my old Synesis code. ;) > > "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c8m2g0$1h7g$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > What about window_visible_scope (analogous to window_enable_scope), any > > plans for that? > > > > > > |
May 27, 2004 Re: window_visible_scope | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Matthew | Great! Thanks... Started using it already! > Here it is! This is not part of beta 8, but will be in the released 1.7.1, which > I think just might be tomorrow. hurrah! |
May 27, 2004 Re: window_visible_scope | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Matthew | If you don't mind the question... What's the static_assert about raw_offests for? (in ~window_visible_scope) I suppose it states that variables should be in the order they were declared, I just don't get why that would matter or why that would change > Here it is! This is not part of beta 8, but will be in the released 1.7.1, which > I think just might be tomorrow. hurrah! |
May 27, 2004 Re: window_visible_scope | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Pablo Aguilar | It's a hack, to allow me to declare members as const, and yet proof myself against future maintenance "improvements". I'm going to write a "Flexible C++" thing about it one day, but time, time time ... ;) "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c93bku$kaq$1@digitaldaemon.com... > If you don't mind the question... > > What's the static_assert about raw_offests for? (in ~window_visible_scope) I suppose it states that variables should be in the order they were declared, I just don't get why that would matter or why that would change > > > Here it is! This is not part of beta 8, but will be in the released 1.7.1, > which > > I think just might be tomorrow. hurrah! > > |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation