Thread overview
Dump mixins (preprocessed/generated) code
Jul 18, 2014
Rikki Cattermole
Jul 18, 2014
Rikki Cattermole
Jul 18, 2014
Dicebot
Jul 18, 2014
Dicebot
July 18, 2014
Hello !

I'm trying to make MiniD/Croc work with dmd2 and I'm having a problem with this code and I want to know how to dump the generated code to understand what's happening.

How that can be done ?

debugmixin.d-mixin-15(15): Error: no identifier for declarator char[]

-----debugmixin.d
/// Eheheh, I has a __FUNCTION__.
const char[] FuncNameMix = "static if(!is(typeof(__FUNCTION__))) { struct __FUNCTION {} const char[] __FUNCTION__ = _getJustName(__FUNCTION.mangleof); }";

template apiCheckNumParams(const char[] numParams, const char[] t = "t")
{
	const char[] apiCheckNumParams =
	"debug assert(" ~ t ~ ".stackIndex > " ~ t ~ ".stackBase, (printStack(" ~ t ~ "), printCallStack(" ~ t ~ "), \"fail.\"));" ~
	FuncNameMix ~
	"if((stackSize(" ~ t ~ ") - 1) < " ~ numParams ~ ")"
		"throwStdException(" ~ t ~ ", \"ApiError\", __FUNCTION__ ~ \" - not enough parameters (expected {}, only have {} stack slots)\", " ~ numParams ~ ", stackSize(" ~ t ~ ") - 1);";
}

void setHookFunc(void* t, ubyte mask, uint hookDelay)
{
	mixin(apiCheckNumParams!("1"));
}

void main()
{
}
-----
July 18, 2014
On 18/07/2014 11:39 p.m., Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
> Hello !
>
> I'm trying to make MiniD/Croc work with dmd2 and I'm having a problem
> with this code and I want to know how to dump the generated code to
> understand what's happening.
>
> How that can be done ?
>
> debugmixin.d-mixin-15(15): Error: no identifier for declarator char[]
>
> -----debugmixin.d
> /// Eheheh, I has a __FUNCTION__.
> const char[] FuncNameMix = "static if(!is(typeof(__FUNCTION__))) {
> struct __FUNCTION {} const char[] __FUNCTION__ =
> _getJustName(__FUNCTION.mangleof); }";
>
> template apiCheckNumParams(const char[] numParams, const char[] t = "t")
> {
>      const char[] apiCheckNumParams =
>      "debug assert(" ~ t ~ ".stackIndex > " ~ t ~ ".stackBase,
> (printStack(" ~ t ~ "), printCallStack(" ~ t ~ "), \"fail.\"));" ~
>      FuncNameMix ~
>      "if((stackSize(" ~ t ~ ") - 1) < " ~ numParams ~ ")"
>          "throwStdException(" ~ t ~ ", \"ApiError\", __FUNCTION__ ~ \" -
> not enough parameters (expected {}, only have {} stack slots)\", " ~
> numParams ~ ", stackSize(" ~ t ~ ") - 1);";
> }
>
> void setHookFunc(void* t, ubyte mask, uint hookDelay)
> {
>      mixin(apiCheckNumParams!("1"));
> }
>
> void main()
> {
> }
> -----

You can use pragma(msg, ""); to output text at compile time if the value is known during compilation (aka can go into a string mixin).

e.g.
pragma(msg, apiCheckNumParams!("1"));
July 18, 2014
Thank you so much !

That did exactly what I was looking for, but now why I'm getting that error message ?

Any help is welcome ! Cheers !

The generated code seems to fine:
----
debug assert(t.stackIndex > t.stackBase, (printStack(t), printCallStack(t), "fail."));
static if(!is(typeof(__FUNCTION__))) {
	struct __FUNCTION {} const char[] __FUNCTION__ = _getJustName(__FUNCTION.mangleof);
}
if((stackSize(t) - 1) < 1)
	throwStdException(t, "ApiError", __FUNCTION__ ~ " - not enough parameters (expected {}, only have {} stack slots)", 1, stackSize(t) - 1);

----
July 18, 2014
On 19/07/2014 12:09 a.m., Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
> Thank you so much !
>
> That did exactly what I was looking for, but now why I'm getting that
> error message ?
>
> Any help is welcome ! Cheers !
>
> The generated code seems to fine:
> ----
> debug assert(t.stackIndex > t.stackBase, (printStack(t),
> printCallStack(t), "fail."));
> static if(!is(typeof(__FUNCTION__))) {
>      struct __FUNCTION {} const char[] __FUNCTION__ =
> _getJustName(__FUNCTION.mangleof);
> }
> if((stackSize(t) - 1) < 1)
>      throwStdException(t, "ApiError", __FUNCTION__ ~ " - not enough
> parameters (expected {}, only have {} stack slots)", 1, stackSize(t) - 1);
>
> ----

I can't really tell at this point.
Try removing the code one line at a time (from the generation). You'll eventually work out what is killing it.
July 18, 2014
While `static if` false branch does not get compiled or semantically evaluated it still should have a valid syntax. __FUNCTION__ gets replaced with a fully qualified name of a function which has dot inside - illegal identifier for a variable. This causes parser to freak out.
July 18, 2014
Thanks for all you answers, I think I found the problem.

The constant __FUNCTION__ was not a compiler reserved word at the time MiniD/Croc was created and it was introduced later on dmd2, it was clashing with it.

I renamed it to __MFUNCTUION__ and it compiles now, I'm getting more errors of other kinds and trying to fix then.

I plan to fork https://github.com/JarrettBillingsley/Croc and make it available.

Cheers !
July 18, 2014
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 14:25:57 UTC, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
> Thanks for all you answers, I think I found the problem.
>
> The constant __FUNCTION__ was not a compiler reserved word at the time MiniD/Croc was created and it was introduced later on dmd2, it was clashing with it.
>
> I renamed it to __MFUNCTUION__ and it compiles now, I'm getting more errors of other kinds and trying to fix then.
>
> I plan to fork https://github.com/JarrettBillingsley/Croc and make it available.
>
> Cheers !

In general all identifiers starting with __ (double underscore) are considered reserved by compiler / standard library and should never be used anywhere else.
July 18, 2014
It seems to be a bug somewhere because tired of getting errors with dmd 2.065 I switched to dmd 2.066 trunk and the error vanished.