Simon Buchan wrote:

> Thought LGPL was the Library GPL, as opposed to Lesser GPL, or is
> there no difference? (Or worse, there is, but the not in the acronym?)

It was, but they (GNU) changed the name in "version 2.1" of the license:

> "This license was formerly called the Library GPL, but we changed the name,
> because the old name encouraged people to use this license more often than
> it really ought to be used."

See http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html

--anders