Yea that is cool hadn't thought of it that way. ( but i still think phobos shouldnt have any conflicts :D ).

Sean Kelly and the Ares crew are making some serious headway with a re-organized phobos at http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=31& , looks very promising!

Charlie

In article <co8gkp$1p92$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
>
>
>"Charlie" <Charlie_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:cnua47$1u8f$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>> And I've really grown to like the import system , but I think its a sign
>of bad
>> design when i cant import std.c.stdlib and std.random w/o conflicts (
>function
>> rand() conflicts ).  Maybe phobos's rand() should be renamed to random() ,
>or
>> the std.c.stdlib needs to be renamed.  I think all of phobos should be
>conflict
>> free.
>
>If they are accessed as std.c.stdlib.rand() and std.random.rand(), there isn't a conflict. That's the beauty of using modules instead of #include, you don't have to give everything a unique name across the board.
>
>