Thread overview | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 27, 2005 Parser Projects | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
With the release of Dimple, it ocurred to me just how many parsers we have around here. I went looking, and found the (rather stale) Wiki page: http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GrammarParsers I've updated this page on the wiki to include Dimple. Those familiar with this part of the wiki will now find a complete cross-reference with links to the following parsing-based projects: -Dimple -Digc -Dmake -Dbuild -Ddoc -Dbindings (for parser.d and lexer.d) -DGrammar -Molt -lr-lalr -H2D I'm pretty sure I've left some out. If you have a parser based project (XML, D, C, whatever) please post your project into the index on this wiki page. - EricAnderton at yahoo |
January 27, 2005 Re: Parser Projects | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to pragma | In article <ctbfg6$3031$1@digitaldaemon.com>, pragma says... > >With the release of Dimple, it ocurred to me just how many parsers we have around here. I went looking, and found the (rather stale) Wiki page: I think that stale was better than nothing. ;) > >http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GrammarParsers > >I've updated this page on the wiki to include Dimple. Those familiar with this part of the wiki will now find a complete cross-reference with links to the following parsing-based projects: > >-Dimple >-Digc >-Dmake >-Dbuild >-Ddoc >-Dbindings (for parser.d and lexer.d) >-DGrammar >-Molt >-lr-lalr >-H2D Thanks for setting this up. I set up the originally page because people kept on asking where an ANTLR grammar was and it's easier to put the answers on a wiki page than keep on looking it up in the newsgroups. At least, it's easier for me. Of course, you've made the page a lot more useful now than what I did. It looks good. > >I'm pretty sure I've left some out. If you have a parser based project (XML, D, C, whatever) please post your project into the index on this wiki page. There's already some XML parsers here: http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?AllLibraries/XmlLibraries Isn't parsing XML a fairly different project than parsing a language like D or Java? We can put them all on the same page if that's the consensus, but it seems different enough to me to warrant a separate list. > > >- EricAnderton at yahoo jcc7 |
January 27, 2005 Re: Parser Projects | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to J C Calvarese | In article <ctbkta$5u6$1@digitaldaemon.com>, J C Calvarese says... > >Thanks for setting this up. I set up the originally page because people kept on asking where an ANTLR grammar was and it's easier to put the answers on a wiki page than keep on looking it up in the newsgroups. At least, it's easier for me. > >Of course, you've made the page a lot more useful now than what I did. It looks good. Glad to be of service. Honestly, I was seeking to answer my own question: why aren't people sharing more source? Obviously, there's more than one answer, but this should help with those few who want to get a running start at a new project. Plus I've been studying/researching parsing technologies for months now, so it was easier for me to see it all in one place. >Isn't parsing XML a fairly different project than parsing a language like D or Java? We can put them all on the same page if that's the consensus, but it > seems different enough to me to warrant a separate list. You're right. XML is a very different task from generic parsing and D parsers (after all, XML is supposed to be one of the easier grammars to target). JC, since you're probably following this thread, wasn't there a more recent header to D-file converter project mentioned here in the NG? I went looking but couldn't find it. - EricAnderton at yahoo |
January 27, 2005 Re: Parser Projects (H2D) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to pragma | In article <ctbn04$8ad$1@digitaldaemon.com>, pragma says... >JC, since you're probably following this thread, wasn't there a more recent header to D-file converter project mentioned here in the NG? I went looking but couldn't find it. I think you mean this: http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D/14676 I don't think it has a website yet (I didn't notice one). And it's name will probably change since there's the separate project at dsource called "H2D". > >- EricAnderton at yahoo jcc7 |
January 27, 2005 Re: Parser Projects | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to pragma | > Glad to be of service. Honestly, I was seeking to answer my own question: why > aren't people sharing more source? Obviously, there's more than one answer, but > this should help with those few who want to get a running start at a new project. Im working on an interface for DMD , its mostly done but still running it through some tests , and trying to understand some parts of the frontend ( like why some Dsymbol's Loc structs are invalid :( ) . I'll post a link to it when im done case anyone wants it . Charlie "pragma" <pragma_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:ctbn04$8ad$1@digitaldaemon.com... > In article <ctbkta$5u6$1@digitaldaemon.com>, J C Calvarese says... > > > >Thanks for setting this up. I set up the originally page because people kept on > >asking where an ANTLR grammar was and it's easier to put the answers on a wiki > >page than keep on looking it up in the newsgroups. At least, it's easier for me. > > > >Of course, you've made the page a lot more useful now than what I did. It looks > >good. > > Glad to be of service. Honestly, I was seeking to answer my own question: why > aren't people sharing more source? Obviously, there's more than one answer, but > this should help with those few who want to get a running start at a new project. > > Plus I've been studying/researching parsing technologies for months now, so it > was easier for me to see it all in one place. > > >Isn't parsing XML a fairly different project than parsing a language like D or > >Java? We can put them all on the same page if that's the consensus, but it > > seems different enough to me to warrant a separate list. > > You're right. XML is a very different task from generic parsing and D parsers > (after all, XML is supposed to be one of the easier grammars to target). > > JC, since you're probably following this thread, wasn't there a more recent > header to D-file converter project mentioned here in the NG? I went looking but > couldn't find it. > > - EricAnderton at yahoo |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation