Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
February 09, 2005 1.8.2 - reg_value_sequence and reg_value problems with auto_buffer | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Both classes have the same issue as others I believe I reported before, namely that they weren't updated to match the new auto_buffer buffer access, and still rely on the old implicit conversion operators. It's not a problem, I'm just posting it so you can fix it for 1.8.3... Pablo |
February 10, 2005 Re: 1.8.2 - reg_value_sequence and reg_value problems with auto_buffer | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Pablo Aguilar | Thanks Pablo. IIRC I fixed this a while ago, but I'll certainly check again. For the benefit of all: I'm really sorry 1.8.3 is taking so long, but I'm *really* determined to get the automated processes in place, so things can be much much faster in the future. "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cue6ge$g4b$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Both classes have the same issue as others I believe I reported before, namely that they weren't updated to match the new auto_buffer buffer access, and still rely on the old implicit conversion operators. > > It's not a problem, I'm just posting it so you can fix it for 1.8.3... > > Pablo > |
March 01, 2005 Re: 1.8.2 - reg_value_sequence and reg_value problems with auto_buffer | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Pablo Aguilar | This should now be fixed in 1.8.3 beta 1. Please let me know if it's not. "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cue6ge$g4b$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Both classes have the same issue as others I believe I reported before, namely that they weren't updated to match the new auto_buffer buffer access, and still rely on the old implicit conversion operators. > > It's not a problem, I'm just posting it so you can fix it for 1.8.3... > > Pablo > |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation