February 02, 2013 Re: Property discussion wrap-up | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to TommiT | On Thursday, 31 January 2013 at 16:44:03 UTC, TommiT wrote: > So, going back to the concept of property as a crossbreed between a namespace and a variable. Here's my new take on it: > [..] Let's scratch that idea. See this instead: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/poiplzvdkfrdohobniif@forum.dlang.org |
February 02, 2013 Re: Property discussion wrap-up | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Johannes Pfau | Just cross posting proposal http://forum.dlang.org/post/rnwpxkmyihpzqlevhcoz@forum.dlang.org Thanks) |
February 03, 2013 Re: Property discussion wrap-up | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jacob Carlborg | On Monday, 28 January 2013 at 19:37:40 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2013-01-28 14:28, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>
>> I agree optional parens take getting used to.
>
> I think it was easy to get used to. Now it's instead harder to use other languages which doesn't allow optional parentheses.
I can imagine there is an advantage in expressiveness,but OTOH wouldn't it make parsers based tooling more difficult to build ? One of the great advantages of a static language is having powerful tooling, something that doesn't exist in most dynamic languages.
|
February 03, 2013 Re: Property discussion wrap-up | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to SomeDude | On Sunday, 3 February 2013 at 06:09:35 UTC, SomeDude wrote:
> On Monday, 28 January 2013 at 19:37:40 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> On 2013-01-28 14:28, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>>> I agree optional parens take getting used to.
>>
>> I think it was easy to get used to. Now it's instead harder to use other languages which doesn't allow optional parentheses.
>
> I can imagine there is an advantage in expressiveness,but OTOH wouldn't it make parsers based tooling more difficult to build ? One of the great advantages of a static language is having powerful tooling, something that doesn't exist in most dynamic languages.
This surely makes it harder.
|
February 03, 2013 Re: Property discussion wrap-up | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jacob Carlborg | On Monday, 28 January 2013 at 19:37:40 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2013-01-28 14:28, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>
>> I agree optional parens take getting used to.
>
> I think it was easy to get used to. Now it's instead harder to use other languages which doesn't allow optional parentheses.
easy != simple . We should reach for simple.
|
February 03, 2013 Re: Property discussion wrap-up | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Johannes Pfau | On Friday, 25 January 2013 at 18:57:17 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> As the property thread is growing big again, arguments get lost, etc I
Maybe it's time for a new thread: "Wrap-up of the property discussion wrap-up"...
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation