Thread overview | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
February 25, 2005 ACE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
I started reading C++ Network Programming v1 just a few hours ago. Due to an unhealthy tendency of mine of always reading 2 things at once I went to see what riverace.com had to offer (it's mentioned a lot in the introduction). There I found references to 3 ACE books, and then a reference to Mattthew's review of C++NPv2 in CUJ. Now, knowing he just got out of an ACE-heavy project, I'm left wondering... how did using it meet the expectations expressed in the review? And what's the reason behind ACEStl? Pablo Aguilar |
February 25, 2005 Re: ACE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Pablo Aguilar | BTW I haven't even finished chapter 0, and have already had a good dose of the word reify "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cvlt56$2crs$1@digitaldaemon.com... >I started reading C++ Network Programming v1 just a few hours ago. Due to an unhealthy tendency of mine of always reading 2 things at once I went to see what riverace.com had to offer (it's mentioned a lot in the introduction). There I found references to 3 ACE books, and then a reference to Mattthew's review of C++NPv2 in CUJ. > > Now, knowing he just got out of an ACE-heavy project, I'm left wondering... how did using it meet the expectations expressed in the review? And what's the reason behind ACEStl? > > > Pablo Aguilar |
February 25, 2005 Re: ACE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Pablo Aguilar | Id be interested in this too . What does 'reify' mean btw ? C "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cvlt7d$2csn$1@digitaldaemon.com... > BTW I haven't even finished chapter 0, and have already had a good dose of the word reify > > "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cvlt56$2crs$1@digitaldaemon.com... > >I started reading C++ Network Programming v1 just a few hours ago. Due to an unhealthy tendency of mine of always reading 2 things at once I went to > >see what riverace.com had to offer (it's mentioned a lot in the introduction). There I found references to 3 ACE books, and then a reference to Mattthew's review of C++NPv2 in CUJ. > > > > Now, knowing he just got out of an ACE-heavy project, I'm left wondering... how did using it meet the expectations expressed in the review? And what's the reason behind ACEStl? > > > > > > Pablo Aguilar > > |
February 25, 2005 Re: ACE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bamb00 | From: http://www.wordreference.com/definition/reify.htm " consider an abstract concept to be real " "bamb00" <no@email.com> wrote in message news:cvo29u$1gsc$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Id be interested in this too . What does 'reify' mean btw ? |
February 25, 2005 Re: ACE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bamb00 | "bamb00" <no@email.com> wrote in message news:cvo29u$1gsc$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Id be interested in this too . Cool. That'll make 3 of us, then. :-) > What does 'reify' mean btw ? It means "to make real" > > C > "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:cvlt7d$2csn$1@digitaldaemon.com... >> BTW I haven't even finished chapter 0, and have already had a good >> dose of >> the word reify >> >> "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cvlt56$2crs$1@digitaldaemon.com... >> >I started reading C++ Network Programming v1 just a few hours ago. >> >Due to >> >an unhealthy tendency of mine of always reading 2 things at once I >> >went > to >> >see what riverace.com had to offer (it's mentioned a lot in the introduction). There I found references to 3 ACE books, and then a reference to Mattthew's review of C++NPv2 in CUJ. >> > >> > Now, knowing he just got out of an ACE-heavy project, I'm left >> > wondering... how did using it meet the expectations expressed in >> > the >> > review? And what's the reason behind ACEStl? >> > >> > >> > Pablo Aguilar >> >> > > |
February 25, 2005 Re: ACE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Pablo Aguilar | He he "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cvlt7d$2csn$1@digitaldaemon.com... > BTW I haven't even finished chapter 0, and have already had a good dose of the word reify > > "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cvlt56$2crs$1@digitaldaemon.com... >>I started reading C++ Network Programming v1 just a few hours ago. Due to an unhealthy tendency of mine of always reading 2 things at once I went to see what riverace.com had to offer (it's mentioned a lot in the introduction). There I found references to 3 ACE books, and then a reference to Mattthew's review of C++NPv2 in CUJ. >> >> Now, knowing he just got out of an ACE-heavy project, I'm left wondering... how did using it meet the expectations expressed in the review? And what's the reason behind ACEStl? >> >> >> Pablo Aguilar > > |
February 25, 2005 Re: ACE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Pablo Aguilar | "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cvlt56$2crs$1@digitaldaemon.com... >I started reading C++ Network Programming v1 just a few hours ago. Due to an unhealthy tendency of mine of always reading 2 things at once I went to see what riverace.com had to offer (it's mentioned a lot in the introduction). There I found references to 3 ACE books, and then a reference to Mattthew's review of C++NPv2 in CUJ. > > Now, knowing he just got out of an ACE-heavy project, I'm left wondering... how did using it meet the expectations expressed in the review? I like ACE, and we found it very useful. It's not what I would term the best C++ I've ever seen, by any means, but as a library it's top notch. I'm hoping to give feedback to the ACE team as soon as I have some free time. There were several confusing/misleading things in the 3 books, but once we'd got past them, we came up with a really powerful architecture, which has so far proven exceptionally reliable. > And what's the reason behind ACEStl? Because there were lots of things that I needed that're not present in ACE, and which are now present in ACESTL, including: - Custom event handling - now provided in acestl::custom_event_handler - linear byte-wise enumeration of the contents of a message queue - now provided in acestl::message_queue_sequence and quite a few utility functions, for ACE_Message_Block, sockets, time strings, string access, etc. Since I'm only now hours away from STLSoft 1.8.3b1, you'll be able to have an (as yet undocumented) play with them very soon. :-) Cheers Matthew |
February 25, 2005 Re: ACE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Matthew | Thanks for the info... Good luck with 1.8.3! "Matthew" <admin@stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message news:cvo4la$1j9k$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cvlt56$2crs$1@digitaldaemon.com... >>I started reading C++ Network Programming v1 just a few hours ago. Due to an unhealthy tendency of mine of always reading 2 things at once I went to see what riverace.com had to offer (it's mentioned a lot in the introduction). There I found references to 3 ACE books, and then a reference to Mattthew's review of C++NPv2 in CUJ. >> >> Now, knowing he just got out of an ACE-heavy project, I'm left wondering... how did using it meet the expectations expressed in the review? > > I like ACE, and we found it very useful. It's not what I would term the best C++ I've ever seen, by any means, but as a library it's top notch. I'm hoping to give feedback to the ACE team as soon as I have some free time. > > There were several confusing/misleading things in the 3 books, but once we'd got past them, we came up with a really powerful architecture, which has so far proven exceptionally reliable. > >> And what's the reason behind ACEStl? > > Because there were lots of things that I needed that're not present in ACE, and which are now present in ACESTL, including: > > - Custom event handling - now provided in acestl::custom_event_handler > - linear byte-wise enumeration of the contents of a message queue - now > provided in acestl::message_queue_sequence > > and quite a few utility functions, for ACE_Message_Block, sockets, time strings, string access, etc. > > > Since I'm only now hours away from STLSoft 1.8.3b1, you'll be able to have an (as yet undocumented) play with them very soon. :-) > > Cheers > > Matthew > > |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation